Unexpected or expected result? You decide.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: carriage_hill
2 posted on
07/03/2013 4:14:43 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: null and void
Ping to Nut Job Conspiracy...
3 posted on
07/03/2013 4:14:53 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
To: carriage_hill
Our believable government. The brazenest lie ever.
4 posted on
07/03/2013 4:17:56 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: carriage_hill
Too late...the truth has already rolled out.
5 posted on
07/03/2013 4:18:08 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: carriage_hill
They LIED for Clinton, and then the US was attacked
because of their abdication on 911.
THEY BELONG IN PRISON for misprision of felony
and aiding al Qaeda
(even if it is in vogue in the White Hut).
To: carriage_hill
then why does no one believe this?
7 posted on
07/03/2013 4:23:41 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: carriage_hill
I don't know exactly what happened to TWA Flight 800 that night, but after reading many comments from pilots I'm almost 100% certain that it didn't happen the way the government investigators claimed it did.
The fact that you had the FBI and CIA involved in an airline disaster investigation, and that the CIA felt compelled to produce an animated video of an explosion/crash sequence that was comical to anyone who had flown an airplane, made this thing suspicious from the get-go.
9 posted on
07/03/2013 4:25:23 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
To: carriage_hill
What are those Long Islanders going to believe, the official report, or their lying eyes?
11 posted on
07/03/2013 4:30:32 AM PDT by
OldNewYork
(Biden '13. Impeach now.)
To: carriage_hill
If the cause was really the faulty wiring in the center fuel tank of the plane, why weren’t Boeing 747s grounded world-wide to correct the problem?
12 posted on
07/03/2013 4:32:23 AM PDT by
JohnG45
To: carriage_hill
We were watching the news the night it happened, and heard from multiple eyewitnesses that night. I call bullshit on this. These people are covering their butts. They really have no choice.
It’s Clinton’s fault. He demanded the coverup for election purposes IMO.
13 posted on
07/03/2013 4:33:03 AM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: carriage_hill
Of COURSE it was an accident ...
They meant to scare 'em ... not shoot 'em down.
oops ... sorrey.
14 posted on
07/03/2013 4:34:00 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: carriage_hill
The fuel tank explosion explanation also raises the question of why all 747’s worldwide were not grounded until a fix could be effect.
16 posted on
07/03/2013 4:35:33 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Doing the same thing and expecting different results is called software engineering.)
To: carriage_hill
18 posted on
07/03/2013 4:38:01 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: carriage_hill
If this case was so cut and dried, why did the government threaten multiple witnesses who contradicted the official story?
The government has been proven many times now to have lied, not just about this case but in many cases; the latest being the “rogue” IRS agent story. Once someone is shown to be a compulsive lier, you can never trust anything they say. The government now exists not to serve the people, but to protect itself from the people.
19 posted on
07/03/2013 4:38:02 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
(We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
To: carriage_hill
![](http://mcguff1.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/baghdadbob.jpg)
All these eye witness accounts were lies. All lies.
23 posted on
07/03/2013 4:41:01 AM PDT by
McGruff
(I need a new party.)
To: carriage_hill
Are the investigators suggesting there was any chance at all they were going to come out and say oh we lied back then? If not then there was no purpose for this briefing.
27 posted on
07/03/2013 4:57:11 AM PDT by
wiggen
(The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
To: carriage_hill
More federal lies. Our government has proved itself totally and completely untrustworthy.
LLS
28 posted on
07/03/2013 4:57:12 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: carriage_hill
Being a Freeper when TWA 800 happened, I remember the first speculation was that a Naval exercise was going on at the time of the TWA 800 incident, which included a surface to air missile test firing, possibly from a submarine.
This new "documentary" coming out apparently comes to the same conclusion.
Did Navy Sub hit TWA 800?
32 posted on
07/03/2013 5:06:56 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
To: carriage_hill
Gee if the center fuel tank was the problem why did it take the FAA two years to issue an Airworthiness Directive?? Seems that the FAA would want to prevent any other 'accidents'!
http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=4796&print=go
34 posted on
07/03/2013 5:10:37 AM PDT by
Lockbox
To: carriage_hill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson