[Sacajaweau]

If you're going to throw out the opinion of the interrogator then the entire tape should be thrown out BECAUSE the interrogator can lie, trick, provoke the "subject". In other words, the interrogator creates "false" situations and the subject has to fit the truth into the interrogators lies.

The best example is the interrogator saying there was a video...and GZ responding "Thank God". No bad guy with underlying malice would say that.

[RummyChick]

“The best example is the interrogator saying there was a video...and GZ responding “Thank God”. No bad guy with underlying malice would say that. “

Not true . Could be a front to fool police BUT NOT IN THIS CASE. I believe you could hear real honest relief in his voice.

[XenaLee]

Exactly. But this anti-Z judge will no doubt allow the state to cherry-pick whatever portions of whatever testimony they wish to keep in the record.