I knew this back when it first came up and the “representatives” turned off their fax machines so that they wouldn’t have to listen to the voters say that We the People do not want it
The WSJ is obviously a racist organization for pointing this out. Any thing that is critical of Obamacare stems from racism.
$5000 DEDUTIBLE, and then it only pays HALF of medical costs? Wow! What a bargain at only $63 per month.
Thanks for telling us what we already know.
But WSJ: where were your alarms when 0 was about to be elected for the first time? When our elected traitors ‘voted for 0care before they could see what was in it’? When we demanded proof of 0’s elegibility?
Too busy getting those southern borders erased and the existing illegals legitimized I guess.
But one of the many reasons real Americans have traded up to IBD and only use the WSJ for their pet dog.
Here’s another little factoid about the exchanges that has a long fuse ... your exchange subsidy is based upon your 2012 tax return BUT the subsidy will be trued up with your 2014 income after the fact. Had a bad year in 2012 but 2014 turns out good? Look for a surprise in Feb of 2015 when you do your taxes for the first year under Obamacare. Your subsidy will be trued up with actual income and any excess subsidy clawed back. Too late for the midterms, though.