Posted on 06/30/2013 8:38:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
After Tuesday’s testimony in the George Zimmerman trial by star witness Rachel Jeantel some of my white devil, honky, gringo, pasty skin, mackerel snatchin’, Caucasian buddies got all up in arms about Rachel Jeantel stating that “creepy ass cracker” is not a racial slur.
First of all, Rachel, and I hate to break it to you, sister -- and I use that word “sister” in the strictest biblical sense of the word -- but “creepy ass cracker” does, historically, denote derision towards the pigmentally challenged of this world.
By pointing this out to you, I do not mean to demean or berate you. It’s just a friendly FYI I’m putting out there for you to consider, for future reference, because it does offend some of my tribe’s more genteel members.
That said, it really doesn’t offend me. Matter of fact, I prefer cheeky ass cracker to creepy ass cracker as the former borrows capital from British slang and merges it with an 18th century Floridian colloquialism, making it at least a quasi-compliment for this 21st century, brutish wordsmith; while the latter denotes a middle-aged white dude who comments way too much on a cute teenage girl’s Facebook page. Or a teenage boy’s Facebook page, for that matter. But I digress …
Another thing that got a lot of my WASPY buddies miffed by your testimony last week was the fact that the media isn’t Paula Dean-ing you for your use of an obvious racial epithet. To that I would suggest just forgiving them if they tweeted you something untoward, as some of my buddies are arriving a little late to the party and it’s just now dawning on them that the media is unsympathetic to their genome’s plight.
Thirdly, I’d watch it calling someone or something “retarded.” A lot of folks, especially those with special needs friends and family members, take umbrage to that phraseology. It’s just a suggestion to consider. Seriously.
Another thing to ponder if you happen to get called to the stand again, is to get your stories straight while you’re giving testimony or it could turn out better for the defense than the prosecution.
And finally, I know you didn’t ask for this type of spotlight to bear down on you but, if I were you, I would really, really dial down on the rude answers and the obtuse facial expressions, as it sure didn’t look great on television, and at the end of the day, we all have to get along.
IMOP and I am sure manny others;
Cracker spewed by a black is the equivilant to Nigger being spewed by a white.
Only the race-baiters that spun this case as W on B rasism at the start and now see it was B on W rasism would and now disagree.
Sucks to be them.
Martin and Geantel have and had a dislike for whites and that was proven by Geantels testimony and demeanor.
Its the “Crackers” fault they are where they are in society, although Geantel has an 11th grade education going into 12 and knows how but refuses to speak any thing close to proper english and or at least fake it when needed.
She is a perfect example of why so many blacks are stuck in poverty.
Black or white,no business unless forced, would hire Rachel.
And that will be everyone else’s fault.
I still feel Geantel egged Martin on which is the reason for her testifiable guilt about the shooting.
I was debating some libs last night on Facebook, and it just absolutely astounds the amount of brainless morons out there, it’s incredible. It’s like we are going through some sort of moron apocalypse.
I was telling them one witness testified the other day seeing Trayvon on top of Zimmerman pounding him, and if they look at the police tape made immediately after the shooting (this one..)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PX1sxARNq_c
Zimmerman describes a man coming out while Trayvon was pounding him and screaming for this guy to help him.
And here is THAT guy, John Good, testifying about it!
Oh no no no they say, that is all lies. One woman in particular telling me there are 4 witnesses who saw ZIMMERMAN beating Trayvon! What? Come again?
This is fascinating to me because it explains why we also have so many morons in office including the King moron from Kenya. Are there *that* many idiots in this country? Do they honestly believe Zimmerman broke his own nose? Cracked his own head against the curb? Can they watch that tape and in all good honesty believe Zimmerman is not credible? It’s just unreal, I really don’t understand it. Is it the tech? All the mobile phones, computers, video games that are frying peoples brains where they can’t grasp logic?
As long as the ‘spot light’ is on Ms. Jeantel is she the poster gal for Welfare, single parent, government housing, Food stamp, disability, public school failure of America? Liberal policies have kept this person on the Reverends Al Sharpton/Jessie Jackson Democrat Plantation...we saw hundreds if not thousands of her ilk stranded in NO during Katrina...is this what will happen to our new amnesty citizens so they will vote for a Democrat? Thank you Ms. Jeantel for your display of “the hyphenated American”.
I can't believe someone thinks impeaching this truthless witless was "taking bait" in a game of fish. A man's whole future is at stake, and that means lying witnesses against him must be discredited.
there is no money in “outrage” for white people.
no freebie gov. benefits
no quota set asides
no racist comedy show profits ala fx chanel
just no money.
Speaking of puttin’ on a Ritz, I’ve heard Obambi referred to as “half Honkey, all Donkey”.
Wonder if that’s considered racist...
Me not a big fan of debating a faceless and possible fictitious rival.
Creepy Ass-Cracker: White Person with gun.
(Simple) Cracker: Unarmed White person, elsewhere defined as "Prey".
An "OREO"Maybe?
the outrage should be that the state is willing to sacrifice a person’s life. Make no mistake his life is over. Sacrifice a person’s life for POLITICAL gain for democrats, for profits of the racists outrage industry, and elite media egotism.
I wish the special prosecutor and the entire prosecution team be disbared.
I was wondering, since she defamed Zimmerman as a “creepy-ass cracker”, she has obviously changed the ground rules. Can we now refer to her as a “lying-ass N-word”. (And no, I mean the word that the silly minced oath ‘N-word’ actually stands for.)
Just ask your liberal relative to look at this scenario.
GZ is in his truck going to the store, he sees a stranger loitering around in the rain. GZ watches for a minute, and decides it is no big deal and goes about his business. The next morning a neighbor doesn’t show up for work, can’t be reached and the police enter the home. Several bodies are found, and the house has been ransacked. The first question to GZ would be why didn’t you do more, you were the neighborhood watch guy.
Like the OJ trial, the government and the prosecution team have a winning slogan:
“If he’s a cracker, he must be the attacker”
Yeah, she's been a bit niggardly in presenting the Whole Truth.
DING DING DING...we have a winner.
Notice her eyes. She’s looking at someone in the courtroom. Her lawyer? Trademarks mother? Probably getting signals on how to answer!
Good to know that she’s 19 and entering her senior year in high school. All the folks who are saying it’s the teachers’ fault she cannot read cursive and hasn’t learned a thing because ‘the teachers should have held her back’ — can now know that, indeed, the teachers have held her back. It just didn’t take.
I’ve offered two people the opportunity to look up “ass cracker” on urbandictionary.com but they both declined quite vehemently.
The government and their prosecution team should be charged and tried for bring this to trial...
This case against Zimmerman was tainted from the beginning, when Obama inserted himself into the case, totally impairing and undermining this case.
Why in sam hell would a President of the United States inject himself into a domestic criminal case before the case was ever tried? This is f’ning outrageous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.