Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart

I’m “swift” enough, I was just commenting on her inability to articulate her ideas and the need for both the Defense and Prosecution lawyers to dumb down their questions so she could understand and respond to the satisfaction of the jury.

You need to be swift enough to identify that I was not questioning her truthfulness, just her inability to articulate because of the public education she was subjected to.


91 posted on 06/28/2013 9:20:48 PM PDT by doc1019 (There is absolutely no difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: doc1019
She was clearly lying. She changed parts of her statement by her own admission. She claimed to have written a letter she later admitted she could not even read.

The real problem isn't that she's stupid (she is) that she's uneducated (she is) English isn't her first language (it isn't) or that she's black (so what?)

The problem is that she's a liar.

94 posted on 06/28/2013 9:23:55 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Separated by a common language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: doc1019

Yes I know you were saying she was honest and straight forward but, the poor thing just couldn’t express herself in that manner due to the failure of public education she was “subjected” to.

I think you’re off base. She’s street smart and was lying..period.
It didn’t have anything to do with her being uneducated.


128 posted on 06/28/2013 10:33:50 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson