Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day 15 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | June 28, 2013 | Sundance

Posted on 06/28/2013 5:14:39 AM PDT by Uncle Chip

Today, June 28th, is DAY #15 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. [Yesterday] … it was simply not a very good day at all for the prosecution. The primary State witnesses today were Rachel Jeantel, Jenna Lauer, and Selma Mora.

The first had her credibility substantively destroyed, the second was powerfully–almost humiliatingly–co-opted by the defense, and the third provided testimony entirely consistent with the defense’s theory of lawful self-defense. (continue reading)

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; floridojudicirats; georgezimmerman; kangaroo; kangaroocourt; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,461-1,477 next last
To: CA Conservative

So, he doesn’t fit any one of those....


861 posted on 06/28/2013 12:40:43 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

“My rule of thumb” (before monsoon, during the dry heat) is what-e-vah temp it is at 10:00 am, add 10 degrees as a guesstimate for the high.

As an observation, it’s darn hot out there.


862 posted on 06/28/2013 12:42:02 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies]

To: lawdave
Lay people and clients always find it weird that the warring lawyers can be civil to each other, but is actually the way it is supposed to be. The parties may hate each other, but the lawyers are supposed to conduct themselves professionally. It is not personal to them or should not be at any rate.

I think that's also the rational for hookers not kissing their clients ... not a dissimilar profession

.

863 posted on 06/28/2013 12:42:25 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies]

To: lawdave

>> It is not personal to them or should not be at any rate.

I imagine it’s easy to keep it non-personal when that “any rate” is, like, $500/hour. :-)


864 posted on 06/28/2013 12:42:30 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies]

To: All

Has anyone else noticed the fact that GZ appears to be left-handed as he writes at the defense table?

Yet the holstered gun was on his right side when he offered it to the LEO. Why would a lefty carry a concealed weapon on his right side? Cross draw maybe? But he doesn’t seem to have the body style that would effectively allow a cross draw.


865 posted on 06/28/2013 12:43:57 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies]

To: don-o

:-)


866 posted on 06/28/2013 12:44:28 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

No kidding. If I hadn’t watched from the beginning, I would assume he WAS a witness for the defense.


867 posted on 06/28/2013 12:44:51 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44 ('Hey citizen, what's in YOUR closet?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
In a case like this, there are often "lesser included charges". Manslaughter is a lesser included charge to Murder 2. Murder 2 means you intentionally kill someone with malice, but not pre-meditated (That would be Murder 1.) Manslaughter means you killed someone without a legal justification, but not with malice. Involuntary manslaughter is when you accidentally kill someone.

SO, which one do you think they will try to go for? What is the sentence for that if convicted?

868 posted on 06/28/2013 12:44:55 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Ok.....:)


869 posted on 06/28/2013 12:45:37 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
So he did have knuckle injuries? I wouldn't know that by reading pro TM tweeters. One would think that he did not have one skinned pinkie.
870 posted on 06/28/2013 12:45:55 PM PDT by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

He could be like me. I write with my left hand, shoot and throw right-handed, and can do most other things either way.


871 posted on 06/28/2013 12:46:23 PM PDT by Ironfocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I don’t think there is a chance the prosecution will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that GZ had NO reason to be in fear for his life. Just the injuries he sustained should be sufficient. The only other way to defeat the self-defense claim would be to show that he attacked TM first. There is absolutely no physical evidence to suggest that, and no eyewitnesses saw the beginning of the struggle. GZ doesn’t have to prove he didn’t start the fight - the state would have to prove he did. With no wounds on TM other than the gunshot wound and the banged-up knuckles, I don’t see how they prove that.


872 posted on 06/28/2013 12:46:24 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; toldyou

Yes, I feel so blessed that I wasn’t seriously injured. I grew up in a rather tough small farming community, and I unfortunately had more than my share of fights with other country boys. Fighting with these guys was so different though. It has such a sense of complete cruelty and senseless behind it.

The boy that first hit me in the face was probably about 13 years old. I was lucky I moved my face at the right time because his fist just brushed my scalp. If I didn’t move, I’m sure I would have a huge black eye or worse.

It’s kind of silly asking the question “Was GZ close enough to death to use his gun?”

Believe me, the moment that something like this happens your adrenaline goes into major overdrive. There is no way you can even reason, your body just begins taking whatever self defense moves it can.


873 posted on 06/28/2013 12:46:48 PM PDT by MNDude (Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
I think GZ has a good chance of walking on this charge, but you can guess that a federal civil rights charge, and a Martin family wrongful death suit are next.

Poor guy, he helps clean the street and gets nothing but trouble for it.

874 posted on 06/28/2013 12:46:59 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

I work with a hispanic girl who uses both hands for everything (she gets alot done. :)


875 posted on 06/28/2013 12:47:06 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; CA Conservative
Theoretically, a jury could determine that the shooting was not in self-defense, but did not have all of the required elements of Murder 2... In that case, they could convict on manslaughter.

My only jury duty ever was a second degree murder case where one black man shot another at close range with a shotgun and killed him. The man shot was entering the other mans home.

After deliberating for less than an hour, we agreed we could not convict of 2nd degree murder, and before we rendered a verdict sent a note to the judge asking if he could be convicted of manslaughter instead. The judge sent back that we could only rule on the charge brought forth by the prosecutor, could NOT rule on manslaughter, so we continued with our verdict of not guilty of 2nd degree murder.

876 posted on 06/28/2013 12:47:22 PM PDT by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
SO, which one do you think they will try to go for? What is the sentence for that if convicted?

Well, they are TRYING for Murder 2. They jury will get the instruction from the judge that they can also consider manslaughter. Murder 2 is 20 years to life; manslaughter, about 5 years.

877 posted on 06/28/2013 12:48:33 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

What is this crap? What was he thinking?? Really?

This judge is an absolute souless pos.


878 posted on 06/28/2013 12:48:46 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44 ('Hey citizen, what's in YOUR closet?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

There is a lot of evidence that could come in with a civil trial about the THUG


879 posted on 06/28/2013 12:48:56 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies]

To: Ironfocus

The prosecution is clearly becoming visibly agitated...


880 posted on 06/28/2013 12:49:46 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Tips for the prosecution: "If he's a cracker, he's the attacker" ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,461-1,477 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson