Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Has Florida lawyer Joe Scarborough ever heard of double jeopardy? Ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 06/24/2013 5:05:26 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest

People are still innocent until proven guilty in this country aren’t they?


3 posted on 06/24/2013 5:07:56 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Has Florida lawyer Joe Scarborough ever heard of double jeopardy?

Indeed, such appeals are usually brought by a convicted defendant, so the entire premise is based on the similarity in race (or rather, the lack thereof) between the jurors and the *defendant* The "victim" isn't part of the picture.

Joe has rocks in his head.

13 posted on 06/24/2013 5:15:59 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I don’t recall the right to a trial by your alleged victim’s peers.


18 posted on 06/24/2013 5:23:13 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Envy is just passive, lazy greed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

He means appeal a conviction, there is no appealing a not guilty verdict


21 posted on 06/24/2013 5:25:21 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Has Florida lawyer Joe Scarborough ever heard of double jeopardy?

The Written Constitution is so 18th century that it's not worth reading, and it was obsolete even then. In the Living Constitution, double jeopardy is less important than diversity, since diversity is the centerpiece of the penumbra.

24 posted on 06/24/2013 5:30:39 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

They really scrape the bottom of the barrel to come up with these folks. For him to say something so ludicrous he would have to be woefully ignorant of the most basic tenets of US law, or assume his audience is a cackle of complete morons.

I suspect it is that latter. After discussing politics with a few of them, I also suspect he is correct.


26 posted on 06/24/2013 5:31:31 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The Constitution isn’t something he is familiar with.


35 posted on 06/24/2013 5:37:12 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Joe is another one who slept through High School Civics apparently


42 posted on 06/24/2013 5:50:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson