Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2013 2:35:08 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Hojczyk

General Dollar doesn’t have the IRS or Justice Dept on their payroll.

Pray for America to Wake Up


2 posted on 06/22/2013 2:38:14 PM PDT by bray (Stop tolerating beheading!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
This stuff no longer has any meaning. The law means what they say it means. Which is to say that there is no law. If they do not like you, then you are racist and are in violation of federal statues. If they do like you, then you are entitled to big government checks because that is what the law requires.

I'm watching this trainwreck of a society and I am in awe.

3 posted on 06/22/2013 2:38:51 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I think it’s much more racist to imply that African Americans are all criminals.


4 posted on 06/22/2013 2:39:11 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Generally....the most stupid thing that a small business can do....is simply hire someone for a responsible job involving money and the cash register....without checking the guy’s background. Course, no one in the EEOC has ever run a business...so they wouldn’t understand that.


5 posted on 06/22/2013 2:39:39 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Background checks would weed out most Democrats from consideration.


6 posted on 06/22/2013 2:40:50 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

This article is a lie. Businesses HAVE to be able to do background checks prior to employment. If this is actually taking place and the government wins, then they have to drop background checks for schoolteachers. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.


7 posted on 06/22/2013 2:40:52 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

This should be laughed out of court. After all, how many felons does the Federal gubermint employ? Oh, wait. That would be the Cabinet. Nevermind.


8 posted on 06/22/2013 2:41:13 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Guidelines by commissions are now the law of the land. Laws made at the wave of a hand, anywhere, anytime for any reason.


9 posted on 06/22/2013 2:42:50 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

but of course if an employee assaults or rapes a customer, Dollar General will still be sued


10 posted on 06/22/2013 2:42:52 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Just one more issue ripe for exploiting by the next Republican candidate for President.

If we can find one with a spine.

11 posted on 06/22/2013 2:46:12 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Non-union companies.

Need I say more?


12 posted on 06/22/2013 2:48:16 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

There have been several attempts at this. At one point the government didn’t want background checks until after all the interviews. The reasoning was that “qualified” candidates were not even getting the interviews because they had criminal records. If a candidate is qualified then you find out he has a criminal record you are supposed to evaluate what impact that might have. For example, he was sentenced to five years for assault. But he could run your register and count your receipts because that’s not going to involve assault. The liberal thinking is, this poor guy should not suffer for one bad decision. He is, after all, paid in full. He is no different now than anybody who does not have a record.

My own experience is that ex-criminals are still criminals they just haven’t been caught at it. Poor decision making is part of who they are. Granted, some people change. But do you want to risk your business on it when there are thousands of honest people who have kept their nose clean vying for the same job?


14 posted on 06/22/2013 2:49:42 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

If you are a truck driver, train engineer, boat captain, pilot, etc. you will have to have a fairly clean record and pass an FBI background check to transport hazardous materials. Maybe somebody needs to sue the feds.


15 posted on 06/22/2013 2:49:42 PM PDT by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
"It’s now unlawful to discriminate against applicants who have committed a crime."

How much more of this are the American people going to tolerate?

16 posted on 06/22/2013 2:51:37 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("'1984' is the essence of 'liberalism'." rlmorel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Counter-sue, since the gov’t conducts background checks for millions of employees and contractors.


17 posted on 06/22/2013 2:51:55 PM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
"When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt,
but protects the corrupt from you
- you know your nation is doomed."

-Ayn Rand


18 posted on 06/22/2013 2:52:09 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stylecouncilor

SC ping....


20 posted on 06/22/2013 2:53:30 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

21 posted on 06/22/2013 2:54:05 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Q: The worst president in US history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

ALL FBI JOB CANDIDATES UNDERGO A BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

Planned Parenthood runs a criminal background check on all volunteers.


23 posted on 06/22/2013 2:58:01 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The best court argument is that by forcing companies to hire ex-felons, the executive branch is diminishing the authority of the judicial branch.

Already the judiciary is constrained by sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences; but this weakens them from the other direction, that criminal sentences are effectively reduced from the judges’ discretion.

Likewise it can be argued that ex-cons on parole or probation must be offered jobs in positions of authority; or even the extreme, that prison is no barrier to employment, so that prisoners can mail in resumes while incarcerated, and employers must consider them, as if they were handicapped and incapacitated at home.

This being said, if the purpose of judges is further reduced, what purpose do judges serve? Punishments can be ordered against individuals by bureaucrats, and nobody can hold it against the criminal as punishment after.


24 posted on 06/22/2013 2:58:51 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson