Posted on 06/19/2013 7:14:07 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
Serena Williams has sparked an intense backlash after she suggested the 16-year-old victim in the Steubenville, Ohio, rape case was asking to be assaulted.
The world Number 1 tennis star made the astonishing indictment in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine, which was posted online on Tuesday.
In the article, Williams said the victim 'shouldn't have put herself in that position' and described her as 'lucky.' Some are already labeling the 31-year-old's remarks the most controversial of her career.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Todd Akin call you office.
If she was a Republican, they’d be crucifying her right now for saying this.
It always makes one a target to speak the Truth.
I remember one of the female tennis players, I think it was Chris Evert or maybe Martina Hingis, just simply said the girls on the Tennis tour do not like the Williams Sisters.
I will say they look very, well athletic.
Serena is correct. The first responsibility of avoiding harm is oneself. If you haven’t taken reasonable precautions to avoiding harmful situations, you have contributed to your situation.
Having said that, having failed to,take reasonable precautions does not remove one iota of responsibility from the person doi,g the harm.
I don’t know enough about the case to comment but in general when men make such controversial statements, feminists often call for women to be included in positions of power...the military for instance. Well, here is a powerful female and she formed an opinion.
The truth is that both the girl and the boys were in the wrong. Except the girl was punished first, for being stupid. And most of the boys evaded punishment.
In this case, it is something like when children take nude pictures of themselves and send them to their friends, then are arrested for producing child pornography.
Children are compelled to want to be sexual, and to want to be adult. It is a biological imperative. But to prevent this, for the good of society, parents and other adults have to intervene. Their failure to keep good discipline over children is the third stupid mistake in this.
Neil Rogers. Good radio personality. Horrible person.
Williams/Akin 2016!
Next up, the liberal non-apology apology, “I’m sorry if anyone was offended....”
Not only that, but some victims clearly outrank others. Thus, an adult lesbian who has a sexual encounter with an underage teen in the school bathroom cannot justly be prosecuted for it because gays now outrank everybody else--blacks, women, sexually assaulted children, dead babies, you name it.
Take issue with this viewpoint? Then you are a HATER!
“What happened in Steubenville was a real shock for me. I was deeply saddened. For someone to be raped, and at only sixteen, is such a horrible tragedy! For both families involved – that of the rape victim and of the accused. I am currently reaching out to the girl’s family to let her know that I am deeply sorry for what was written in the Rolling Stone article. What was written – what I supposedly said – is insensitive and hurtful, and I by no means would say or insinuate that she was at all to blame.
I have fought all of my career for women’s equality, women’s equal rights, respect in their fields – anything I could do to support women I have done. My prayers and support always goes out to the rape victim. In this case, most especially, to an innocent sixteen year old child.”
Thank you Serena. Blame that victim.
From a quote from Serena.
‘She’s 16, why was she that drunk where she doesn’t remember? It could have been much worse. She’s lucky. Obviously I don’t know, maybe she wasn’t a virgin, but she shouldn’t have put herself in that position, unless they slipped her something, then that’s different.’
Serena is right on this.
The girl should have not gone to the party and drink alcohol. She put herself in a dangerous situation. If she used her head, she could have avoided it.
What the guys did was wrong too. No doubt about that.
She is now the victim in “blame the victim”?
I find it astonishing that anyone would disagree.
Any young woman who is in the company of a group of young men is putting herself at great risk. She is essentially stating, by her actions, that she trusts them not to do anything to her against her will. Such trust is often justified, but not always, unfortunately.
Consuming alcohol in such company just makes the situation infinitely worse. She was apparently, in this case, unaware of what was being done to her. She put herself totally, probably without being aware of doing so, in the hands of whoever was around, and trusted in their decency and honor. Appears her trust was betrayed.
Was she "lucky?" She could easily have wound up physically raped, as in "rape rape," which she apparently wasn't and as a result presently be pregnant or infected with a number of STDs. She also could have wound up severely physically injured or dead.
So, yeah, she was lucky relative to what could have happened to her.
Does any of this excuse the behavior of these young males who should not be honored with the name "men?" Of course not. Nobody can possibly despise them more than I do.
Serena said she 'shouldn't have put herself in that position.' The inverse of this statement, if you are going to disagree with her, is that she SHOULD have put herself in that position, that it was a wise and intelligent decision to make. Going off at 16 with boys she doesn't know and then getting too drunk to be aware of what is happening.
Is anybody seriously going to contend that this was a wise decision on her part?
Growing up, my mother said don't ever go where you are the only girl and do NOT go or stay where you don't know anyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.