Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethanol leading to a corn-based bubble
Fuel Fix ^ | June 6, 2013 | by Zain Shauk in Beaumont

Posted on 06/08/2013 11:03:53 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

A corn-based bubble is building on the horizon, with expectations of a large oversupply of high-priced ethanol that has nowhere to go.

The phenomenon is a product of environmental requirements and subsidies that are currently leading refiners to buy ethanol at record prices, according to analysis from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Refiners and other parties that produce fuels are required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to buy supplies of ethanol to blend with their gasoline. For each gallon of ethanol they blend into their fuel, refiners get a credit, also known as a Renewable Identification Number, or RIN.

Refiners need to acquire a set amount of RINs annually to meet EPA requirements, and can also do so by buying RINs from other parties.

While the current supply of corn-based ethanol is down, because of a drought that affected production, output is expected to grow to levels that will leave the country with an oversupply of the fuel that will go unused unless something changes.

That’s because the EPA is requiring refiners to buy more ethanol at a time when fuel makers say they can’t blend any more of it into their gasoline.

The nation’s consumption of gasoline is falling and refiners say they can only replace 10 percent of their main gasoline blend with ethanol.

Ten percent of the nation’s expected 2013 gasoline consumption 13.3 billion gallons, a volume of ethanol that would fall within the mandate this year. But 10 percent of gasoline consumption will likely fall short of mandates in the future, EIA analyst Sean Hill said.

While the EPA and U.S. Department of Energy have insisted that gasoline blends including as much as 15 percent ethanol is safe for most vehicles, automakers and the oil industry have disagreed. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at fuelfix.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: carbontax; energy; ethanol; kenyanbornmuzzie; opec; whataload
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2013 11:03:53 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

From article:

Without marketing more of a higher blend of ethanol, refineries could be left blending ethanol into gasoline that is not used, just to meet EPA requirements, Hill said.

An alternative could be for refiners to start making more E85, which is a blend of gasoline with 85 percent ethanol, Hill said.

But most gasoline stations do not sell E85 and the majority of fuel makers have no way of changing retail stations to sell more of that fuel.


2 posted on 06/08/2013 11:05:42 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
An excess of ethanol...the thought boggles the mind.

It can be used as moonshine or converted to vinegar. It can serve as a feedstock for many chemical processes or directly as a solvent.

Waste ethanol is an oxymoron.

3 posted on 06/08/2013 11:15:56 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (We say "low-information" but we mean "low-intelligence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

Oil out of the ground is a lot more efficient....


4 posted on 06/08/2013 11:29:04 AM PDT by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

I have some ideas on what to do with it...


5 posted on 06/08/2013 11:43:07 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Fuel ethanol production is a actually down quite a bit from a few years ago.


6 posted on 06/08/2013 11:46:06 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

E10 is a waste of corn for food production, is inefficient to produce, and does not increase mileage.

E15 already is, and will cause untold damage to pre-2012 model engines and fuel systems.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/30/aaa-e15-gas-harm-cars/1735793/

The EPA scam continues.


7 posted on 06/08/2013 11:47:37 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee; ptsal
An alternative could be for refiners to start making more E85, which is a blend of gasoline with 85 percent ethanol, Hill said.

The service manager of the local Government Motors dealership stated that GM told him that switching from E-85 to gasoline the user would increase their mileage by 30%.

8 posted on 06/08/2013 11:48:17 AM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Ethanol plants here in Indiana are closing up like old K-Marts. I doubt there will be an oversupply.


9 posted on 06/08/2013 11:48:23 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

Makes sense.

Ethanol has significantly less heat content per volume vs. gasoline.

With the huge increase in domestic oil and gas production, ethanol has become “yesterday’s fuel”


10 posted on 06/08/2013 11:50:53 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

Almost. Ethanol has 30% less BTUs than gas. So, at e-85 (85% ethanol) you would get 25.5% less mileage. There is no way around this. Basically what you get is a nearly 26% increase in cost tho...


11 posted on 06/08/2013 12:05:39 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
I know an old time farmer in Albion NY. He bought 100's of additional acres to raise corn for the, not so far away, ethanol plant and it's making him wealthy.

In the meantime, he no longer raises other vegees.

Maybe someone should tell Michelle that kids can't eat/drink ethanol in school.

12 posted on 06/08/2013 12:37:46 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Another government mandated boondoggle distorting the marketplace.

Watch for lobbying now to increase the blend past E15.


13 posted on 06/08/2013 12:55:58 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
E10 is a waste of corn for food production

Why do people keep repeating this misconception? The corn used for ethanol is NOT for human consumption. Humans could not stand to eat it. It is corn grown specifically to feed cattle and produce other products.

When corn is processed through an ethanol product. The starch, which cattle do not need, is converted to ethanol. The byproduct is distilled grains which is basically enriched cattle feed. The corn is only borrowed for a while to produce ethanol before it is fed to cattle. There are many reasons to complain about US ethanol policy, but saying it is a waste of food is BS. Guess who started the fuel for food rumors? If you said the oil companies, you would be correct.

lain about the US e

14 posted on 06/08/2013 1:23:25 PM PDT by suijuris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
"... the EPA and U.S. Department of Energy have insisted that gasoline blends including as much as 15 percent ethanol is safe for most vehicles..."

BS..read your owners manual... unless you have "flex-fuel" vehicle, using any ethanol blend higher than 10% invalidates the warranty and can cause serious damage to your engine and fuel system. Small engines like in lawn mowers and especially boat motors can be totally wrecked by using a single tank full of ethanol blended gasoline. Corn ethanol is a boondoggle that enriches corn farmers and ethanol producers and does not reduce the consumption of oil. It would be cheaper to just write corn farmers a government check for producing corn than to support this bio-fuel boondoggle.

15 posted on 06/08/2013 1:48:19 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suijuris
yes it IS a waste of food, in the fact that a lot of farmers that used to produce corn for human consumption now produce corn intended for ethanol which in turn makes what corn is left for consumption more expensive... or are you trying to say farmers didn't switch crops
16 posted on 06/08/2013 1:58:23 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

We say “low-information” but we mean “low-intelligence”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Interesting tag but if intelligence means as measured by IQ tests some of the lowest of the low information voters have high IQ numbers. I can show you one in my family, in fact you are welcome to him, 38 years old, computer science graduate, 140 plus IQ, falls for every bucket of crap the left slings, believes every word, thinks he knows more about how the world works than anyone else even though he is a total failure by any normal measure, I know plenty of people with a two digit IQ whose accomplishments exceed his by orders of magnitude but he thinks he is qualified to instruct me in politics. He is as naive as anyone of his age I have ever known but believes he is too smart to be fooled. He is intelligent in a strictly technical way but will probably never live long enough to learn how to run his own life. He actually watches MSNBC to learn the “truth” that is being concealed by Fox News in his view. Some of the most ignorant sounding statements I have ever heard have come from his mouth. I really wish I knew how to help him but he doesn’t think he needs help, he thinks the rest of us need help.


17 posted on 06/08/2013 2:02:13 PM PDT by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
i hear ya, i burn nothing but corn-free gas in my 97 4-Runner and mower...
18 posted on 06/08/2013 2:03:27 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chode; suijuris

It’s a fact. They do use “feed corn” for ethanol. Meaning corn used to produce food for cattle, hogs, chickens, ducks whatever. And animal feed has increased substantially because of the use of corn for ethanol. So, guess who pays for the increase?

Also, and this is a local observation, many farmers here have switched from soybeans and cotton to corn for ethanol. Guess what that does to soy products and cotton products?


19 posted on 06/08/2013 2:16:06 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: saleman
yup, cause and effect... cause-gooberment meddling, effect-higher food prices
20 posted on 06/08/2013 2:19:36 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson