Posted on 06/06/2013 10:05:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Back during the Bush administration, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage famously called Hezbollah the A Team of terrorists, adding, al-Qaeda is actually the B Team. How do these two organizations compare today?
Last week, the State Department released the 2012 issue of its annual Country Reports on Terrorism. At a background briefing, a senior administration official highlighted an alarming trend: a marked resurgence of terrorist activity by Iran and Hezbollah. The tempo of operational activity was something we havent seen since the 1990s. . . We see no signs of this activity abating in 2013. In fact, our assessment is that Hezbollah and Iran will both continue to maintain a heightened level of terrorist activity and operations in the near future.
The State Department is right to see Hezbollah and Iran as joined at the hip: the former is financed and instructed by the latter. That has not always been understood, despite the fact that, prior to 9/11/01, Hezbollah was responsible for more American deaths than any other terrorist organization. And Hezbollahs secretary general, Hassan Nasrallah, has proclaimed, Death to America was, is, and will stay our slogan."
Its well known that Hezbollah has been sending combatants into Syria in support of Bashar Assad, the dictator and Iranian satrap. Less publicized are Hezbollahs operations in other corners of the world. A Hezbollah attack on a bus in Bulgaria last July killed five Israelis and one Bulgarian. In Nigeria, authorities recently broke up a Hezbollah cell, seizing what one Nigerian official called a large quantity of assorted weapons of different types and caliber.
The State Department report contains surprisingly little information about Hezbollah in Latin America. However, a 500-page report issued last week by Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman reveals that Iran has established an archipelago of clandestine intelligence stations and operative agents in Latin America that are being used to execute terrorist attacks when the Iranian regime decides so, both directly or through its proxy, the terrorist organization Hezbollah.
The following are South American countries in which Iran or Hezbollah has set up intelligence/terrorism bases: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago, and Suriname.
Nisman provides additional evidence not that more is needed that Iranian officials and one Lebanese Hezbollah operative were responsible for two terrorist bombings in Argentina in the 1990s. Theres an American nexus too: Nisman charges that Mohsen Rabbani, Irans former cultural attaché in Buenos Aires implicated in the 1994 attack on a Jewish center in Buenos Aires in which 85 people were killed directed Iranian agent Abdul Kadir, now serving a life sentence in connection with the 2010 plot to bomb John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York.
Connect the dots, Nisman argues, and they draw a picture of Iran fomenting and fostering acts of international terrorism in concert with its goals of exporting the revolution.
All this considered, can al-Qaeda still be considered a serious competitor? Yes, it can! Last weekend, my colleague, über-researcher Tom Joscelyn, pointed out that AQ and its affiliates now are fighting in more countries than ever.
In Afghanistan, AQ maintains safe havens in the provinces of Kunar and Nuristan. The Taliban, its loyal ally, is responsible for a level of violence higher than before the Obama-ordered surge of American forces in 2010, according to NATOs International Security Assistance Force.
AQ and its affiliates have bases in northern Pakistan. The Pakistani government, Joscelyn notes, continues to be a duplicitous ally, sponsoring and protecting various al Qaeda-allied groups. The Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), or Pakistani Taliban, remains a threat after orchestrating the failed May 2010 bombing in Times Square. The State Department announced in September 2010 that the TTP has a symbiotic relationship with al Qaeda.
The AQ-affiliated al-Nusrah Front may be the most effective force fighting against Assads troops and against Hezbollah and Iranian combatants in Syria. AQ is resurgent in neighboring Iraq, with April 2013 being the deadliest month in that country in nearly five years, according to the U.N.
AQ has expanded operations in Yemen. In Somalia, Shabaab which formally merged with AQ last year is far from defeated and has managed to carry out attacks in neighboring Kenya and Uganda as well. In Nigeria, Boko Haram continues to slaughter Christians. In Egypt, al-Qaeda members and associates including Mohammed al-Zawahiri, the brother of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri are operating more freely than ever. On 9/11/12 they hoisted an AQ flag above the U.S. embassy in Cairo.
Libyan groups closely linked to al-Qaeda were responsible for the 9/11/12 attack that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb easily took over northern Mali until French forces pushed them out of the population centers. Al-Qaeda affiliates are becoming more visible and perhaps viable in Tunisia, too.
Despite all this, the State Department report asserts that core al-Qaeda is on a path to defeat. I am not convinced that there is sufficient evidence to substantiate that thesis. And even if it does prove to be accurate, whos to say that a weakening core cant be compensated for by a stronger periphery?
In the final analysis, Which is the A Team of terrorism? is not the paramount question. What is: in the years ahead, does the U.S. have what it takes to be the A Team of counterterrorism?
Iran...Period!
islamism
Communism killed over 100 million. These guys are pikers.
According to His Majesty Hussein I, Hezbollah is an ally and Al Quaeda has been destroyed...
Or the Colombian drug cartels?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.