Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New all-solid sulfur-based battery outperforms lithium-ion technology
Physorg ^ | June 5, 2013

Posted on 06/05/2013 8:56:54 PM PDT by ckilmer

Scientists at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory have designed and tested an all-solid lithium-sulfur battery with approximately four times the energy density of conventional lithium-ion technologies that power today's electronics.

The ORNL battery design, which uses abundant low-cost elemental sulfur, also addresses flammability concerns experienced by other chemistries.

"Our approach is a complete change from the current battery concept of two electrodes joined by a liquid electrolyte, which has been used over the last 150 to 200 years," said Chengdu Liang, lead author on the ORNL study published this week in Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Scientists have been excited about the potential of lithium-sulfur batteries for decades, but long-lasting, large-scale versions for commercial applications have proven elusive. Researchers were stuck with a catch-22 created by the battery's use of liquid electrolytes: On one hand, the liquid helped conduct ions through the battery by allowing lithium polysulfide compounds to dissolve. The downside, however, was that the same dissolution process caused the battery to prematurely break down.

The ORNL team overcame these barriers by first synthesizing a never-before-seen class of sulfur-rich materials that conduct ions as well as the lithium metal oxides conventionally used in the battery's cathode. Liang's team then combined the new sulfur-rich cathode and a lithium anode with a solid electrolyte material, also developed at ORNL, to create an energy-dense, all-solid battery.

"This game-changing shift from liquid to solid electrolytes eliminates the problem of sulfur dissolution and enables us to deliver on the promise of lithium-sulfur batteries," Liang said. "Our battery design has real potential to reduce cost, increase energy density and improve safety compared with existing lithium-ion technologies."

The new ionically-conductive cathode enabled the ORNL battery to maintain a capacity of 1200 milliamp-hours (mAh) per gram after 300 charge-discharge cycles at 60 degrees Celsius. For comparison, a traditional lithium-ion battery cathode has an average capacity between 140-170 mAh/g. Because lithium-sulfur batteries deliver about half the voltage of lithium-ion versions, this eight-fold increase in capacity demonstrated in the ORNL battery cathode translates into four times the gravimetric energy density of lithium-ion technologies, explained Liang.

The team's all-solid design also increases battery safety by eliminating flammable liquid electrolytes that can react with lithium metal. Chief among the ORNL battery's other advantages is its use of elemental sulfur, a plentiful industrial byproduct of petroleum processing.

"Sulfur is practically free," Liang said. "Not only does sulfur store much more energy than the transition metal compounds used in lithium-ion battery cathodes, but a lithium-sulfur device could help recycle a waste product into a useful technology."

Although the team's new battery is still in the demonstration stage, Liang and his colleagues hope to see their research move quickly from the laboratory into commercial applications. A patent on the team's design is pending.

"This project represents a synergy between basic science and applied research," Liang said. "We used fundamental research to understand a scientific phenomenon, identified the problem and then created the right material to solve that problem, which led to the success of a device with real-world applications."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battery; sulfer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Jonty30

Right you are. And that’s why I too started my sentence with “If”. But, opposed to other “breakthroughs” we see posted here, at least this one sounds plausible.


41 posted on 06/06/2013 5:16:41 AM PDT by Moltke ("I am Dr. Sonderborg," he said, "and I don't want any nonsense.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
It is SERIES too.

Yep ... wiring the cells in series will boost the battery voltage. This will apparently be necessary.

42 posted on 06/06/2013 5:21:26 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Sulfur eh? Have they tried brimstone yet?

By the way...What is brimstone?


43 posted on 06/06/2013 5:27:09 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

bttt


44 posted on 06/06/2013 5:45:02 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drawsing

Brimstone is elemental sulfur from a volcano..........


45 posted on 06/06/2013 6:27:18 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Drawsing
Brimstone forms around volcanic vents Brimstone is elemental sulfur from a volcano..........
46 posted on 06/06/2013 6:29:24 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: moose07

Yes, it is truly Hugh N. Series!........


47 posted on 06/06/2013 6:30:24 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

Aside from the fact that energy to charge the batteries needs to come from somewhere (as you point out), batteries self discharge, and have horrible cold temperature performance, and with this performance increase have a ridiculously poor energy density in terms of volume and mass compared to liquid fuels.

If you isolate a few performance requirements of fossil fuel powered vehicles, batteries look outstanding, but if you consider all the often competing or opposing facets of what a car is expected to do, they fail miserably.


48 posted on 06/06/2013 6:55:59 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Dang. Our water is just too hard for swimming until it warms up a mite.


49 posted on 06/06/2013 8:48:43 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Here is an Albertan in his backyard pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TLmJhXhUEg :)


50 posted on 06/06/2013 8:50:57 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“I wish I had a dollar for every new battery technology that never made it to market.”

And I’ll take a nickle for every IPO share sold in a new battery technology company that went bankrupt without getting a product to market.


51 posted on 06/06/2013 4:55:52 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson