Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rebelbase

This is how they plan to outlaw videography of police actions. Classify filming as annoying.


14 posted on 06/05/2013 8:38:12 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods

Bingo!


16 posted on 06/05/2013 8:46:52 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

Yep, that’s it: A cop grabs your camera—after he’s shot your Chihuahua—and you’ve committed aggravated annoyance, a felony.
You disrespected and/or harassed him or acted in a way that led to a situation that could result in injuries, most likely yours.


26 posted on 06/05/2013 9:26:16 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

I don’t think this:

“HE OR SHE STRIKES, SHOVES, KICKS OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTS SUCH PERSON TO PHYSICAL CONTACT.”

Applies to filming.

But it could say, if the officer got up close to the videographer and physical contact was made -somehow. And just like that, a class E felony.

Sounds to me it gives officers cover to initiate contact in order to have grounds for arresting an otherwise law-abiding person.

Next up whistles. When they blow the whistle you must drop to the ground and remain in the prone position until the all clear is given.


40 posted on 06/06/2013 4:46:23 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson