“Jim McDemott to Megyn Kelly: How can we be sure these IRS tea-party victims are telling the truth?”
Well, as pointed out by CBS, yes CBS
Democrats were allowed to provide any “progressive” groups to testify and they could not find one.
He’s not doing himself any favors calling normal Americans “liars”. Man needs his butt kicked bad!
Hey McDermott, are you willing to put your meager silly little life and reputation behind it?
In other words, if they are found to be telling the truth will you then crawl up your own smelly little Obama and increase the value of the world measurably?
5.56mm
This guy is probably the worst slimebag in Congress, and that’s saying a lot.
Oh gee, I don’t know Jim, perhaps because there are records of the encounters.
Maybe they should just go out and illegally tape record someone and leak it to the press like he did and to try to steal another election.
******
2006
A federal appeals court ruled today that Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated federal law by turning over an illegally taped telephone call to reporters nearly a decade ago.
In a 2-1 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that McDermott violated the rights of House Majority Leader John Boehner, who was heard on the 1996 call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
The court ordered McDermott to pay Boehner more than $700,000 for leaking the taped conversation. The figure includes $60,000 in damages and more than $600,000 in legal costs.
McDermott leaked a tape of a 1996 cell phone call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to The New York Times and other news organizations.
Too bad he didn’t stay just a few days longer as Saddam’s “human shield.” He could’ve been “Shock and Awed” out of existence.
McDermott is an a**hole on the same level as Alan Grayson.
And this is how Obamacare will be run by the left, when a Republican needs a procedure done they will say “Hey, why should we give that Conservative a new lung, he’s a Conservative, he doesn’t deserve it” get ready people, this is just the beginning
I see your point, Jim. After all, since you clearly don’t give a rodent’s rectum about the oath of office you swore, why would you lean towards believing that these people are going to abide by their sworn oath to tell the truth?
I’m ashamed to even be in the same species as this person.
Jimmy thinks this is the old Soviet Union or the Third Reich. Nazis like him really piss me off.
“Jim McDemott to Megyn Kelly: How can we be sure these IRS tea-party victims are telling the truth?”
Well, as pointed out by CBS, yes CBS
Democrats were allowed to provide any “progressive” groups to testify and they could not find one.
FURTHER! IRS admitted as much and affirmed they had been directed target certain political 501c applicants by their leadership locally and have even explained how it is quite impossible for agents to act on their own.
The leadership created a new layer of paperwork for not only TEA Party applicants and other but, also for their workers and supervisors who would be managed to ensure the questionnaire was being complied with and delays had the desired effect.
a: To cast despersion on the victim.
b: To make victim the feel foolish or insignificant.
-mcdermotted past tense
Ex. "The prosecutor mcdermotted the rape victim until she was no longer able to respond from emotional distress."
Because the IRS apologized to them, you fat stupid f*&^.
Jim would not know the truth if it hit him at 300 mph....
Logical processing of an idea within a specific context of knowledge is necessary and sufficient to establish the idea's truth. If one relates an idea or a belief to the full context of the facts and reduces the idea to the data of the senses, and integrates it with the rest of one's conclusions then the idea has been validated