You are getting weird.
A good point. In fact, entire organizations of like-minded persons could conceivably get married, for, say, tax (and other, perhaps more sinister) advantages.
Then "gun ownership" = semi-auto, full auto, hi/low-capacity, nation-wide.
Heather has two mommies.
And two daddies.
And a kangaroo.
No one can deny that this is a a slippery slope.
Along with the unavoidable push to allow “marriage” for any group of “consenting adults,” regardless of number, sex, or species, we also have the drive to define “adult” as “anyone old enough to say ‘Yes’.”
There will be no limits to the legally-sanctioned depravity.
It dawned on me that some states recognizes “common law” marriage where a man and woman who have lived together for a certain length of time are considered legally married without going through with the actual ceremony, perhaps even against their expressed desire.
So, if gay marriage becomes popular, will common law marriage apply to them and will thousands of cohabitating gays become legally married without the actual rite of ceremony? And will gays protest that different laws should apply to them than for heterosexual couples?
I have found that people who are the most open minded about homosexual marriage are the most close minded about plural marriage.