Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy Scouts' Woes Continue With Assault by Atheists
The New American ^ | 27 May 2013 | Dave Bohon

Posted on 05/27/2013 9:44:48 AM PDT by VitacoreVision



The Boy Scouts’ woes continue as two atheist organizations have attacked their policy of requiring participants and leaders to acknowledge faith in God.

Boy Scouts' Woes Continue With Assault by Atheists

The New American
27 May 2013

On the heels of the news that they caved in to pressure from the homosexual lobby and will allow participation by boys who identify as “gay,” the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) are facing a new assault, this time from the nation's organized atheists. On May 24 the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) fired a warning shot over the bow of the BSA concerning the group's requirement that both participants and leaders express faith in God. The godless group applauded the BSA's initial surrender to the demands of homosexual activists, but challenged the scouting organization on its decision to retain a policy that “bars atheist and freethinking members.”

The BSA's stated policy concerning faith comes in the form of a declaration that the “recognition of God as the ruling and leading power in the universe and the grateful acknowledgment of His favors and blessings are necessary to the best type of citizenship.”

Claiming that one in three teens identifies as non-religious, the FFRF complained that “there’s a long trail of boys and leaders who have been kicked out [of the Boy Scouts] simply because they don’t believe in a God. They range from a six-year-old in suburban Chicago whose nonreligious father, Elliott Welsh, lost a suit against the BSA for violating the Civil Rights Act, to exemplary Eagle Scout Darrell Lambert, expelled from a Washington troop in a high-profile case.”

The FFRF claimed that the Boy Scout ranks “have always been full of nonbelievers,” and chided the BSA for lagging “20 years behind the Girl Scouts of America, which announced in 1993 that it would protect the freedom of conscience of all members.” The atheist complainers recalled that the Girl Scouts “adopted a resolution that any of its members may substitute another word or phrase for 'God' in its official pledge, a measure enacted to show ‘strength in diversity and that we are an inclusive organization.’ ”

Charging that “no one can grow into the best citizen who discriminates against the nonreligious,” the FFRF encouraged its members to hector the BSA with phone calls demanding that it cave in on its foundational conviction that connects faith in God with its mission of raising up boys into responsible men.

The FFRF was apparently riding the coattails of another atheist group, the Secular Coalition for America, which released its own statement affirming the Boy Scouts for their moral collapse, while criticizing them for retaining faith in God as a key value for participation in their ranks. Edwina Rogers, a spokesperson for the secular group, said she was pleased with the BSA's cave-in on the issue of homosexuality, but considered it insufficient. “Discrimination is wrong — whether it’s directed at children or adults, atheists or the religious,” Rogers said.

She noted that the while the BSA is a private organization, it receives federal funding through the use of supplies, space, and equipment. “No organization that discriminates on the basis of religion or religious beliefs should receive federal support,” Rogers said, adding in a tone suggestive of ramped up legal pressure: “We look forward to a time when the Boy Scouts will be a completely inclusive organization that does not discriminate at all based on religious belief or sexual orientation.”

Meanwhile, homosexual activist groups reacted to the Boy Scouts' announcement that they would open their doors to gay-identifying boys, while continuing their ban on homosexual Scout leaders. “They're not on our good list yet,” said the Human Rights Campaign's Paul Guequierre of the BSA's partial policy change on gays, adding that “the new policy doesn’t go far enough. Parents and adults of good moral character, regardless of sexual orientation, should be able to volunteer their time to mentor the next generation of Americans.”

Zach Wahls of the pro-homosexual Scouts for Equality, said that his group would continue to pressure the Boy Scouts to allow homosexual adults access to vulnerable boys, while also looking for opportunities to target the Boy Scouts for discrimination against supposedly gay youth. “We'll act as a watchdog,” Wahls warned. “If any gay youth feel they're experiencing harassment or discrimination, we want to be there for them.”

Rich Ferraro of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) said his group would continue to pressure corporate donors to stop giving to the Boy Scouts, and predicted that homosexual teens participating in the Boy Scouts would help to undermine the BSA's remaining moral barriers to homosexuality. “The BSA now will have to look gay teens in the eye,” he said, “boys who've been involved in Scouting for years, and tell them they're not going to be able to grow into adult leaders.”

Christian leaders and organizations continue to express their sorrow over the BSA's decision to allow participation by boys who identify as homosexual. In a statement, the Assemblies of God denomination noted that a majority of scout groups throughout the nation “are sponsored by churches or other religious entities, which have as their foundation a belief in biblical teachings that identify homosexual behavior as outside of God's plan for sexuality. While we agree that youths who experience confusion or same-sex attraction need to be welcomed, in our churches they are confronted with this biblical teaching and will be counseled and prayed with that God will help them to align their lives in conformity to that teaching. We agree with the BSA that we need to demonstrate compassion and welcome those who are struggling with sexuality issues, but not in a way that condones such behavior, which is what the new BSA policy does.”

As have many other Christian and conservative leaders, Randy Sharp of the American Family Association said that the decision made by a vote of 61 percent of the BSA's voting leaders does not bode well for the future of the storied organization. “I think what we're going to see in the next year or so is a mass exodus of adults and boys from the Boy Scouts of America program,” Sharp told OneNewsNow.com. “Some of the estimates that I've heard are up to 400,000 to 500,000 boys and adults will resign their positions with the Boy Scouts of America.”

Rob Schwarzwalder of the Family Research Council pointed out that such a mass exodus will not be based on a personal hatred or animosity toward people who identify as homosexuals. This isn't about fear or homophobia, and this isn't about bigotry,” he said. “This is about the moral values of our Judeo-Christian heritage, which teaches that the only appropriate sexually intimate activity that exists [is] between a man and a woman within marriage. That's always been the affirmation of Scouts. It is no longer.”

David Cortman of Alliance Defending Freedom emphasized that “those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won't rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members. With its decision the BSA has rejected its freedom to promote and practice the values that have served to shape our nation's boys into leaders for the last century.”


Related Articles:

Pro-Family Groups Warn of Mass Exodus If Boy Scouts Cave to Homosexuals

Strong Reaction Follows Boy Scouts' Decision to Allow Homosexual Members


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antitheism; atheism; atheists; atheistsupremacists; boyscouts; bsa; communistgoals; culturewar; freedomfromreligion; gayagenda; godlessamerica; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; liberalbigots; waronreligion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Max_850

The Scout leadership is weak, but so are the American people.


61 posted on 05/27/2013 11:44:20 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: greene66

You may curse, but the American people support these changes because they believe in “openness”, or at least claim to.


64 posted on 05/27/2013 11:47:22 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

The BSA is the latest organization tolearn the painful lesson of the camel’s nose in the tent.


65 posted on 05/27/2013 11:49:29 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Time to roll up the tent and go home. BSA is done, the progressives have successfully knocked off another fine and traditional institution. Throw it in the trash with the Episcopal “church”... Nothing left but memories...good ones. And one cannot help but replace that void with a little hatred, and as grows the void...


66 posted on 05/27/2013 11:50:24 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( EVERY DIME Obama Spends is given to him by the Republicans in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

There will obviously be a replacement organization. WWW.


67 posted on 05/27/2013 11:51:50 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

“BSA is a private organization. No one has the right to tell them what to think.”

That being the case, it’s sad to think they made that decision on their own volition to allow homos into their ranks.


68 posted on 05/27/2013 11:53:17 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

What’s next?
Restaurants that have a sign that says”No shirt no shoes no service”
That’s clearly discrimination of the clothing challenged.


69 posted on 05/27/2013 11:57:19 AM PDT by glyptol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
So, the atheists are now going to kick the corpse of the BSA in the head to claim partial credit for the kill.


70 posted on 05/27/2013 12:04:42 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Why they would think they could make a logical connection, I don’t know. Or maybe I do know. Atheists have long held sex perversion to be no big deal, since if there’s no God to have created us and to tell us the right way to use our bodies, it’s wide open, and conveniently they often fear population will quickly outstrip the earth (based on a world view which gives humans little or no credit for ingenuity which can transcend such concerns).


71 posted on 05/27/2013 12:32:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Whatever promise that God has made, in Jesus it is yes. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Yep, a NAMBLA bastion. After the queers, pedophiles, and faggots take over the Boy Scouts, and have their way with the young boys, Parents will have lawsuit one after another. Some units had this gong on which scout leaders reported to the local councils, and they tried to sweep “it” under the rug, and ended up with the parents sueing BSA.


72 posted on 05/27/2013 12:39:28 PM PDT by Bullfrogg (American by birth, Irish by heritage, and hellraiser by choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

“Now they will be picked to death by every moon bat group; with the ultimate goal being the demise of the boy scouts. Mission accomplished.”

I tend to agree. The BSA is on its way to dying the death of a thousand cuts. Each concession will erode the base of support and create divisions within the remaining membership. And I think that, for some, that was the plan all along.


73 posted on 05/27/2013 12:42:25 PM PDT by DemforBush (Bring me the head of Alfredo Garcia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Will the BSA finally admit those youths who wish to have sex with their pets?
74 posted on 05/27/2013 12:42:51 PM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: VitacoreVision; All

When I was young enough to join teh scouts we were too poor to afford uniforms. My son tried the cub scouts and I am thankful he decided scouting was not for him. The seeds were sown then, 18 years ago now for the PCification of the Scouts. I am glad we are not tainted now by saying we were scouts.


76 posted on 05/27/2013 12:54:31 PM PDT by USAFJeeper (Who Dat Nation - Loving the Manning Face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

The Mormons have their thirty pieces of silver from the BSA execs now. I suspect next year when adult sodomites are allowed they will happily collect another...


77 posted on 05/27/2013 1:18:22 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

No doubt, the BSA honchos thought that caving to the gay mafia would be the end of it.

Give them the merit badge for appeasement.


78 posted on 05/27/2013 1:30:46 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“The Boy Scouts are setting a horrible precedent”

Yes, they are. Next, girls in the Boy Scouts and boys in the Girl Scouts. “Gender Identify” has become law in Kali: Children encouraged to use whatever bathroom they believe their gender to be.

I can see laws passed quickly that prohibit gender based private organizations like the BSA. If the BSA can let in boys that like boys then why can’t they let in girls that like boys?


79 posted on 05/27/2013 1:45:02 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

With apologies to Ted Geisel: A bully’s a bully no matter how pure.


80 posted on 05/27/2013 1:57:52 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson