Posted on 05/23/2013 12:01:32 PM PDT by Perdogg
House Speaker John A. Boehner on Thursday flatly ruled out chances of the House passing the Senates immigration bill, saying his chamber will debate its own bill instead.
Mr. Boehner and his top GOP lieutenants issued a joint statement that seemed designed to tamp down some of the momentum behind the Senaate bill, which emerged from a Senate committee on a bipartisan 13-5 vote earlier this week, and to stake out a House GOP position
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Thanks.
The House shouldn’t be producing an immigration bill other than to strengthen border and internal enforcement.
There own bill should simply be to see that our current laws are enforced.
Instead it will have 95% of the Senate’s and we’re headed to comprehensive amnesty—with the tea party fully distracted to make sure the American people don’t wake up before it is passed.
Until Obama is gone there is no point in any thing. He does not and will not enforce the law.
He must be made to learn that when there is no law, there is no law.
Boehner wants it to be the House liberal Republicans who pass amnesty not the Senate liberal Republicans. Traitorous bastards.
Head fake.
translation “so when we do pass amnesty, I can say that it’s so much better than what the Senate wanted”
Well, shoot, lemme just ping the list and we’ll let over 600 FReepers take a peek at that little gem of truth...
As a reminder, check the ‘aliens’ keyword at the top of the forum to see other threads related to illegal immigration, our borders, and security issues.
He could have called a vote to convene a special prosecutor on any one of the items in your list but he hasn’t and he won’t.
Boehner has got to go.
“Boehner has got to go.”
Before he passes amnesty.
What is in the House bill? They can reconcile in conference. I think Boeher like McConnell wants amnesty for illegals.
It’s fair to say the border has never been closed.
It’s also fair to say that our polices were such at one time that very few foreign nationals walked across it.
Eisenhower was the last president to address the border before Reagan finally did it around 1986 or 87.
Thirty years had passed, and only three million illegals took advantage of Reagan’s amnesty. That three million illegals who took advantage of it, did so over about three years.
By 1990 the nation was fairly cleared of illegal immigrants. None the less at the end of the decade nine million illegals were in country. That’s three times the number of illegals, in one third of the time span. And that’s only if that nine million count was accurate, which it may not have been.
Something has to be done. It simply can’t be legalization.
We need to close the honey pot. Turn off the flow of freebies. Close down businesses, heavily fine private parties that hire illegals, refuse to educate or provide free medical care to illegals.
Then they go home. And once there they don’t come back because they know they won’t be able to house or feed themselves up here.
The end.
We cannot make the illegals here now legal.
If we do, the supposed 12 million here, will suddenly be 25 to 35 million. And when 25 to 35 million people are naturalized they will be able to bring over immediate family members. Then you add two to five people for each you just legalized. If the average is only three, and we’re talking about 25 million that’s 25 million plus 75 million. That’s 100 million.
Then you have births to this group in short order. Add in another ten million. That’s 110 million.
And then as this is implemented over twenty years, two to four million more people are allowed in legally, as they up the flow of legal immigrants in an effort to alleviate the need for illegal immigration on humanitarian grounds.
Two million times twenty equals 40 million. Add that to the 110 million we already addressed, and we’re talking about easily 150 million in less than 20 years.
I don’t know about you two, but I’m not here to facilitate the United States being taken over lock stock and barrel by Mexico.
To be clear, I wouldn’t advocate the reverse either. Mexicans deserve to have self-determination. White Americans do too.
This is for the survival of the nation we love.
” If we do, the supposed 12 million here, will suddenly be 25 to 35 million. And when 25 to 35 million people are naturalized they will be able to bring over immediate family members. Then you add two to five people for each you just legalized. If the average is only three, and were talking about 25 million thats 25 million plus 75 million. Thats 100 million.
Then you have births to this group in short order. Add in another ten million. Thats 110 million.”
A totally balkanized America, say nothing of national bankruptcy, which will follow.
Or we could invite the British back to finish what they started back in August 1814.
Mexico has a positive population growth figure of 4 million person per year.
In twenty years Mexico could send over 80 million of it’s citizens, and still maintain it’s current population.
It’s not just Mexico either. You can talk to folks clear across this nation, and each of them will tell you about the local community nearby that was completely taken over by some foreign population base.
We’re being flooded with people from all over, in numbers far to vast to assimilate.
We need to stop immigration dead in it’s tracks for a good twenty to forty years.
If there is a compelling reason for a real ‘brain’ if you catch my drift, and exception could be made. We don’t need anymore barely can make it people, who sap us dry.
We need a breather.
How many times are we going to fall for this BS? Its such an OBVIOUS tactic. The Senate comes up with lots of crap so the House amnesty looks good. We don’t want any of it!!!
We don’t want a new car. We can’t afford a new car.
I’ll SELL IT TO YOU FOR 30,000! (Senate)
We don’t want a new car. We can’t afford a new car.
Let me talk to my manager (House)
We don’t want a new car. We can’t afford a new car.
I can sell it to you, if you buy right now, for only 15,000!(House)
Sheep: Golly gee! Thats such a better deal!! We win
Suckers!!!!!!!!!!!!! You lose!!!!
What that means is the House has their own amnesty bill. As HIllary would say “Whats the difference?”.
Oh yeah, Boehner, what House bill is that?
A big fat NO CONFIDENCE in you or any one or anything in D.C. there Johnny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.