Posted on 05/22/2013 3:04:57 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Kaitlyn Hunt’s parents insist that their daughter, a Central Florida high school senior, is being prosecuted for sex crimes only because her lover was another girl. The state attorney says that gender makes no difference; the age of the two girls is at the crux of the case.
Ms. Hunt, 18, is an adult. The girl with whom she allegedly had sexual encounters is 14...
Just before Christmas, they had a sexual encounter in a bathroom at Sebastian River High School. They had at least one more encounter there, according to the affidavit, and one in Ms. Hunt’s bedroom in January after the 14-year-old, a freshman, ran away from home.
The younger girl’s parents went to the police after learning from a coach, school employees and students that their daughter was having a relationship, according to a report from the Indian River County Sheriff’s office. The parents’ information led to the investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...
No. In Post-WWII America, it was quiet, but happened. You just never saw the results. A girl would “go stay with relatives” for a year or so, then return.
Just because it wasn’t open and clearly visible, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Recall the push in the 60s for birth control access and abortion.
In “ye goode olde days” we still had the infamous “backroom abortions”. . .
That's because for most of recorded history teens had sex IN wedlock. And it was usually young girls with older men. Social norms may change but human biology doesn't.
In my school, they were ‘bladder infections’...
I didn’t. I applied Occam’s Razor. High school kids mess around, regardless of flavor.
If there was a HISTORY of this girl routinely seducing much younger girls, then Occam’s Razor would support your hypothesis.
The evidence at hand tends to support that it was a typical high school relationship, albeit not of the usual polarity....
Which laws or moral standards are you referring to ???
Sounds like you’d be happier under shar’ia. . .
I have a couple of former co-workers (now in their 70s) who used to tell stories endlessly about their teenage sexcapades back in the mid-1950s. Some were with the local “bad girls” and others were with the daughters of prominent citizens (the mayor, judges, etc.) I don't know exactly when the “sexual revolution” started, but it was apparently well underway before the 1960s.
Sharia advocates pedophilia and homosexuality.
Think before you touch the keyboard again.
Shar’ia promotes chastity and virginity prior to marriage. . . as long as you’re a female.
Ask anyone who served in the ‘stan about Afghans and Man-Love Thursday.
And last I checked, open homosexuality was a capital crime under shar’ia. It certainly is in Iran and Saudi. . .
Of course, there, they DO care when and if you touch the keyboard.
Here in America, we’re free to do so at any time. We call it “freedom of expression”. You should look that up sometime. . .
If it wasn’t of the usual polarity, then it wasn’t a typical high school relationship, was it?
And I suppose your assertion in post 36 wasn’t sincere? Since I agreed with your assertion therein, you appear to have abandoned that line of argument.
(Some kids...you give ‘em books, pay for their education, even teach ‘em fancy terms and phrases...and they still reject the truth. Nietzsche much?)
Sounds like you’d be happier under shar’ia. . . God's laws and moral standards. You know, the Bible.
When I say laws, I'm referring to God's righteous standards that we should adhere to.
You would seem to be happier in Sodom or Gomorrah, where anything goes.
Sharia advocates pedophilia and homosexuality.
What the heck are you talking about? I don't want Sharia!
I specifically defended NOT marrying at an early age, and for both sexes to remain chaste, as per the standards of the God of the Bible.
The laws I was referring to are the ones that make it illegal to have sex with a minor.
I never imagined that people would mistake my post as promoting Sharia.
I reread my earlier post.
The laws I was referring to are the ones that make it illegal to have sex with a minor.
I'm talking about the Bible. In it, God promotes chastity and virginity prior to marriage.
Are you saying we'd be better off without the Bible or God's standards? He put them there for a reason.
And that part about caring what you type on the keyboard, who is trying to stop you? Feel free to make an ass out of yourself by jumping to unwarranted conclusions about your fellow FReepers.
Thank you. Interesting. It would seem that’s a fact all papers would get right on this topic.
Not you, FOE. I just CC’ed you, sorry, I should have made that plainer.
Thanks for the clarification.
The gay militants have been dying for a story like this, with the goal of lowering the Age of Consent as the main goal.
I’m pretty sure it started with that Adam and Eve couple...
Swiving is one of those words that needs a comeback...sounds classy, like something some freepers would like.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.