Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2013 9:51:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Here’s my answer. Google Southpark, Garrison, Buttsex, evolution.


2 posted on 05/20/2013 9:52:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Only EVIL people approve of Homosexuals.
Those who support homosexuals are against our Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
These anti Christ people only bring destruction on us ALL.
I have NO sympathy for homosexuals!

Homosexuality is a "Mark" of disobedience.
Someone once asked The answer is in the definition of "REPROBATE". And the reason"why" is given in the Bible.

God has a cure for homosexuals.
3 posted on 05/20/2013 9:55:18 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Tell DOJ, “You own this problem and I’m not endorsing anything I don’t believe.”


4 posted on 05/20/2013 9:56:39 AM PDT by G Larry (Darkness Hates the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“I didn’t hear a harump from that guy”. Mel Brooks


5 posted on 05/20/2013 10:00:08 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Actually, my reading of the document is that “silence” will be construed as disapproval by an LGBT employee. I believe that that is a factual statement. The statement is not a threat to a manager.

It is only a threat as far as someone assuming that a feeling of disapproval from an LGBT employee could lead to consequences. You are free to read this into the document, but it isn’t an overt threat.


6 posted on 05/20/2013 10:00:25 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

As I have said, the rump rangers are no longer satisfied to be accepted,they must be publicly praised.


7 posted on 05/20/2013 10:00:41 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

LOL ... speaking is trouble, and silence is trouble ... LOL. It is an obamanation!


8 posted on 05/20/2013 10:02:15 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

VERY scary stuff.


10 posted on 05/20/2013 10:05:12 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All

Me: Hello Mr. gay co-worker.
Gay co-worker: Hello.
Me: What did you do this weekend?
Gay co-worker: My gay boyfriend and I went Antiquing and then we had a parade.
Me: Breath mint!


11 posted on 05/20/2013 10:06:28 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I have come to conclude that I can no longer participate with this tyranical government.


16 posted on 05/20/2013 10:10:29 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (Thy Kingdom come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
“DON’T judge or remain silent. Silence will be interpreted as disapproval.”

Will those who choose to remain silent be simply terminated or will they face prosecution? And if so, will they be read the Miranda warning..."You have the right to remain silent..."

17 posted on 05/20/2013 10:11:02 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Silence seems like disapproval.

A properly formed piece of mud seems like chocolate cake. But it isn't.

19 posted on 05/20/2013 10:14:02 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You can’t win.

“Susan, that’s a really pretty outfit you have on.”

Susan: “Sexual harrassment! I’m offended!”

The next day, co-worker Jim walks in wearing a skirt. Still smarting from yesterday’s reprimand, you sit there and say nothing.

Jim: “You’re being silent! Insensitivity! I’m offended!”


22 posted on 05/20/2013 10:17:42 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Silence speaks only to those that have have already decided what they want to hear.


24 posted on 05/20/2013 10:17:56 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

These “conversations” inflict harm on religious people and everyone else.

These afflicted people’s need to have these “conversations” is a form of Sexual Addiction. We should file a class action suit for Sexual Harassment.

Forcing others to participate in their sexual practices is Exhibitionism. Take names and file suit for Sexual Harassment.


25 posted on 05/20/2013 10:19:07 AM PDT by donna (Pray for revival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is straight out of “A Man for All Seasons”:

Cromwell: Now, Sir Thomas, you stand on your silence.
Sir Thomas More: I do.
Cromwell: But, gentlemen of the jury, there are many kinds of silence. Consider first the silence of a man who is dead. Let us suppose we go into the room where he is laid out, and we listen: what do we hear? Silence. What does it betoken, this silence? Nothing; this is silence pure and simple. But let us take another case. Suppose I were to take a dagger from my sleeve and make to kill the prisoner with it; and my lordships there, instead of crying out for me to stop, maintained their silence. That would betoken! It would betoken a willingness that I should do it, and under the law, they will be guilty with me. So silence can, according to the circumstances, speak! Let us consider now the circumstances of the prisoner’s silence. The oath was put to loyal subjects up and down the country, and they all declared His Grace’s title to be just and good. But when it came to the prisoner, he refused! He calls this silence. Yet is there a man in this court - is there a man in this country! - who does not know Sir Thomas More’s opinion of this title?
Crowd in court gallery: No!
Cromwell: Yet how can this be? Because this silence betokened, nay, this silence was, not silence at all, but most eloquent denial!
Sir Thomas More: Not so. Not so, Master Secretary. The maxim is “Qui tacet consentire”: the maxim of the law is “Silence gives consent”. If therefore you wish to construe what my silence betokened, you must construe that I consented, not that I denied.
Cromwell: Is that in fact what the world construes from it? Do you pretend that is what you wish the world to construe from it?
Sir Thomas More: The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.


26 posted on 05/20/2013 10:19:46 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I just spent 10 months as a contract Program Manager at a Fortune 500 company. It was an ubber-politically correct company where, among other things, all jokes were forbidden. Employees had to sign a 10 page “ethics” statement mostly forbidding political incorrectness. Basically, all non-work related conversations were frowned on, if not outright banned. In 10 months I can’t remember any occasion to speak one way or another about gayness. It just doesn’t come up in the workplace. There were several religious Christians, but they spoke in whispers when speaking to each other. (They were the superior go-to employees.)


28 posted on 05/20/2013 10:22:22 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
This does us no good - the sentence is taken out of context and indicates that if an employee comes out to you, that the employee is apt to take silence as a sign of disapproval.

While it's likely to morph over a period of time, at this juncture, it's probably an accurate statement whether one can stomach homosexuals becoming more overt or not. It is not a threat to managers as it shows up in the pamphlet.

30 posted on 05/20/2013 10:24:06 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Silence will be interpreted as disapproval.”

Savage Dan better not ask me if his dress makes his ass look big...


31 posted on 05/20/2013 10:25:10 AM PDT by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
•DO “Attend LGBT events sponsored by DOJ Pride and/or the Department, and invite (but don’t require) others to join you.”
•DO “Display a symbol in your office (DOJ Pride sticker, copy of this brochure, etc.) indicating that it is a ‘safe space.’”

I am a government employee. I refuse to comply with this. Deal with it.

34 posted on 05/20/2013 10:30:04 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (The Cardinals chose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson