Is Cincinnati some outpost?
From CSPAN:
Posted on 05/19/2013 8:39:00 AM PDT by chessplayer
"Can you see in your mind's eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn't intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?"
Yes.
listen stooopid, go back to feeding yer face... Because whatever an ignorant, low-class cow like you has to say, isn't worth paying attention to... Is it?
Ping me when she skips a meal.
crowley is on the payroll
Apparatchiks will do what is needed.
Krauthammer was right in his prediction that the media would quickly fall back into line. If an actual recording was found with obama himself ordering the IRS to go after the GOP and Christians for purely political reasons, the media would get behind obama.
It doesn’t matter. All that matters is that the government is out of control and all powerful.
Of COURSE this wasn’t political. Geez. And the author isn’t a dumb jack ass either.
oh, wait.....
I noticed the turn in the news coverage all week long. It’s been called the “Tea Party scandal” rather than the “IRS Scandal.”
Then the supposedly in-depth articles like the ones in the New York Times that claim it wasn’t political, just incompetence.
Her body is taking nutrients away from her brain.
There is not a single shred of integrity in the MSM.
Crowley it’s about as possible as you passing a doughnut shop without buyer a couple of dozen.
Her mother.
I see she didn’t learn her lesson after being smacked during that debate. Dumb bitch.
.. and as more and more realize this is a matter of election FRAUD of the highest degree -- betrayal of the public trust TREASON in other words -- the more the Obamamedia will drag out the dull and tiresome issues about election 2000.
google search for links to articles: site:www.questia.com how-bush-won 2000 florida
google search: "How Bush Won" a discussion of the court decisions
google search: Bush Won election 2000 los angeles times
just a few suggestions to find election 2000 information.
One selected article included here. This one: Ask FactCheck - The Florida Recount of 2000
According to a massive months-long study commissioned by eight news organizations in 2001, George W. Bush probably still would have won even if the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed a limited statewide recount to go forward as ordered by Florida’s highest court.Bush also probably would have won had the state conducted the limited recount of only four heavily Democratic counties that Al Gore asked for, the study found.
On the other hand, the study also found that Gore probably would have won, by a range of 42 to 171 votes out of 6 million cast, had there been a broad recount of all disputed ballots statewide. However, Gore never asked for such a recount. The Florida Supreme Court ordered only a recount of so-called "undervotes," about 62,000 ballots where voting machines didn’t detect any vote for a presidential candidate.
None of these findings are certain. County officials were unable to deliver as many as 2,200 problem ballots to the investigators that news organizations hired to conduct the recount. There were also small but measurable differences in the way that the "neutral" investigators counted certain types of ballots, an indication that different counters might have come up with slightly different numbers. So it is possible that either candidate might have emerged the winner of an official recount, and nobody can say with exact certainty what the "true" Florida vote really was.
The study cost nearly $1 million and was the most thorough and comprehensive news-media review of the Florida balloting. It was sponsored by the Associated Press, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, St. Petersburg Times, Palm Beach Post, Washington Post and the Tribune Co., which owns papers including the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel and Baltimore Sun. The news organizations hired the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago . . . .
Likewise it is not easy to prove that had the right not been hampered by OUR OWN GOVERNMENT! that all those who predicted an Obama defeat were in fact correct. The election was a fraud committed by government employees. Treason.
See also: "Explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach, Fl" in FR.
It is possible Candy. It is also possible that with team Obama’s penchant for using intimidation that the order came from the inner circle at the white house. When Obama first took office the SEIU was picketing wall street managers homes, we had Flag@whitehouse.gov, attackwatch and so many more instances of Obama sicking the dogs on his enemies that it’s not hard to believe they would do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
