Posted on 05/18/2013 5:30:51 AM PDT by gusopol3
Even in the conservative press, it has become received wisdom that President Obama was AWOL on the night of September 11, after first being informed by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, in the late afternoon, that the State Department facility in Benghazi was under attack. You hear it again and again: While Americans were under attack, the commander-in-chief checked out, leaving subordinates to deal with the crisis while he got his beauty sleep in preparation for a fundraising campaign trip to Vegas.
That is not true . . . and the truth, as weve come to expect with Obama, is almost surely worse. There is good reason to believe that while Americans were still fighting for their lives in Benghazi, while no military efforts were being made to rescue them, and while those desperately trying to rescue them were being told to stand down, the president was busy shaping the blame the video narrative to which his administration clung in the aftermath.
We have heard almost nothing about what Obama was doing that night. Back in February, though, CNS News did manage to pry one grudging disclosure out of White House mendacity mogul Jay Carney: At about 10 p.m., the president called Secretary Clinton to get an update on the situation.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
That would be spun as suborning perjury. I would rather they be subpoenaed and, if they don't show, the House can issues warrants and send the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest them and compel their appearance.
Parenthetically, this is insane that we've arrived at the point in this country where these discussions are needed.
See the tale of Lt. John Ezra Dahlquist.
That is the same thing that X-President Clinton did to Janet Reno. Plausible deniability.
Little barry bastard boy’s spokesperson, Midway Carney announced during a presser at the WH that Obama and Hillahag spoke on a ten PM call.
well someone at the WH level set Newsy to air a lie for them which came on TV before the smoke stopped rising at the compound!
Why was Stevens in Benghazi with no real protection? He was in on the game too, but these two brave men spoiled Obama’s plan.
Think about it weeks of “Save Stevens” banner headlines then just before the election “Our Hero” brings him home with is great skills.
http://www.thebrennerbrief.com/2013/05/06/was-benghazi-a-set-up-to-release-the-blind-sheik/
Personally, I beliee this theory is closer to the truth than anything found out thus far. If I were on that investigative committee, I would be pushing this constantly. Someone got close to the truth when “Hitlary” lost it and shouted<What difference does it make?” That alone to me is enough to push even harder to get her to completely break and to roll over on Odumbo. They were in on the plan from the get-go and it backfired.
Great work you’re doing. Exhaustive research. Please put me on the list. This was a black op from the start. How can the country be run if there is so much subterfuge occurring
I do NOT get it. This has nothing to do with laziness or incompetence. It has to do with a president and administration ACTIVELY PROMOTING JIHAD! It's TREASON! This is not accidental, it's ON PURPOSE! Why don't you get it?? MYGOD!
Thank you my dear! I hope you are improving. May God protect you.
BTTT!
I think this commercial was aired not to apologize to the muslims but to introduce the YouTube video to the muslim world in hopes of further violence to further justify the crappy video as the culprit. After all, no one had even heard of the video until then.
It was clear at the time that the above was the purpose of the ad paid for by US taxpayers to the tune of hundreds of thousands of $. After all, when Benghazi happened there were only something like 300 view of the stupid thing. 0moslem and Hitlery wanted more mozlems to see it and hopefully get riled up.
And also to justify “The future does not belong to those who cricize (or did he say “blaspheme”) Islam.”
They want Sharia hatespeech laws.
--------
I'm with you on this. Obama is NOT incompetent at accomplishing HIS purposes... which is destroying this country via communism and jihad. Jimmy Carter was incompetent. I believe he truly wanted to be a good president, he just wasn't that bright and was infected with liberal do-goody ideas.
Obama, on the other hand, is cunningly evil, and works in tandem with multiple other people to accomplish his goals, without ever getting too near the dirty work. That he has been able to hit our country in so many different directions without (so far) getting implicated personally, says that he is NOT incompetent, is is quite skilled at destruction, which is exactly what he and his handlers want to happen.
It's not as if all these things are happening because he's trying to do the right thing and just bumbling along and making mistakes.
The faux kidnapping/exchange story came out soon after the Benghazi killings. It is the only scenario that makes ANY sense. Explains why the rescue teams were told to stand down. Obama thought he had it all arranged with Al Queda. Someone will step up and tell on Obama before this is over.
I wonder if Hillary was aware of the arrangement before the killings.
Ring!
Hillary, whats up?
Shut up you turd! Some a**hole ex-seals f***ed up the whole operation and tried to rescue our people!
Thats terrible! Is there any good news?
Yeah, the seals are dead and wont be talking.
Whew! Thanks!
Just STFU and get ready for Vegas. Ill have the cover story when you get back.
Yes Maam...
Click.
As noted in the comments: when that 03:00 AM phone call came, neither one of them knew what to do.
Also, wasn’t there a 10:30 PM event when the public lying began?
Much worse than Zero’s act of homicide and subsequent coverup were the reasons behind AQ’s attack on the Benghazi facility in the first place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.