Skip to comments.
Certification of Microstamping Technology (No Pistols for Sale in CA)
Bureau of Firearms ^
| May 17, 2013
| Kamala D. Harris (AG in CA)
Posted on 05/17/2013 6:58:34 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA
It appears microstamping is now the law in CA. (effective immediately) Read at the link. Seems like a typical Friday document dump from the fascists.
The purpose of this bulletin is to inform California licensed firearms dealers, California Department of Justice certified laboratories, firearm manufacturers with firearms listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale in California, and all other interested persons/entities of the Department of Justices certification on May 17, 2013 pursuant to Penal Code section 31910, subdivision (b)(7)(A) that the microstamping technology is available to more than one manufacturer unencumbered by any patent restrictions.
In 2007, Assembly Bill 1471 was passed and signed into law, requiring all semiautomatic pistols to be equipped with microstamping technologya microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol, etched or otherwise imprinted in two or more places on the interior surface or internal working parts of the pistol, and that are transferred by imprinting on each cartridge case when the firearm is fired. (Pen. Code, § 31910, subd. (b)(7)(A).) The legislation further provided that this requirement becomes effective when the Department of Justice certifies that the technology used to create the [microstamp] imprint is available to more than one manufacturer unencumbered by any patent restrictions. (Ibid.)
(Excerpt) Read more at oag.ca.gov ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
If understand this correctly, Ca just screwed the pooch. Either gun manufacturers will produce guns with microstamping technology and sell in Ca or it will not be possible to purchase a semi-auto pistol in Ca.
Watch Ny, Ct, Nj, Md, and Co fall in line.
This law is hideously stupid. The microstamping can be filed down. A firing pin can be replaced. Or you can simply shoot cases into a bag. Liberals are so effing stupid. By way, I have an extra Beretta 92fs firing pin for sale ($449). Just kidding.
To: ConservativeInPA
“By way, I have an extra Beretta 92fs firing pin for sale ($449)”
Sell it on Amazon LOL
2
posted on
05/17/2013 7:00:19 PM PDT
by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
To: marktwain
To: ConservativeInPA
I haven’t missed the beaches in several years.
To: ConservativeInPA
"This law is hideously stupid. The microstamping can be filed down. A firing pin can be replaced. Or you can simply shoot cases into a bag." Or buy a revolver...
5
posted on
05/17/2013 7:06:35 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: ConservativeInPA
Following the issuance of the Department of Justice's certification, the provisions of Penal Code section 31910, subdivision (b)(7)(A) are in immediate effect. Therefore, to be listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale in California, a semiautomatic pistol must be equipped with microstamping technology-i.e., a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number ofthe pistol, etched or otherwise imprinted in two or more places on the interior surface or internal working parts ofthe pistol, and that are transferred by imprinting on each cartridge case when the firearm is fired. (Pen. Code,§ 31910, subd. (b)(7)(A).)
Semiautomatic pistols already listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale in California will remain on the roster and need not incorporate the microstamping technology provided that the firearms comply with Penal Code sections 32015, 32020, and 32030.Read that as no new tech for Ca gun owners. Existing guns are grandfathered. It will be interesting to see how updates to existing pistols will be effected.
6
posted on
05/17/2013 7:10:38 PM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
(Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
To: ConservativeInPA
To: ConservativeInPA
So, who exactly has this miraculous, fool proof, patent-free technology?
8
posted on
05/17/2013 7:22:10 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: smokingfrog
So, who exactly has this miraculous, fool proof, patent-free technology?I'm a little fuzzy on the patent part. I thought CalGuns owned the patent and wasn't sharing. Maybe there is a new patent of different design, and/or Obama's people in the Patent Office are not protecting IP.
9
posted on
05/17/2013 7:26:48 PM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
(Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
To: ConservativeInPA
This is BS! “If we don’t hang together, we will hang separately”.
10
posted on
05/17/2013 7:26:57 PM PDT
by
stevio
(God, guns, guts.)
To: ConservativeInPA
And to think, back in 1982 the voters of California turned down Proposition 15 which would have banned handguns in California.
Since that day the anti gunners have been working overtime trying to find ways around the will of the people.
Can’t ban handguns? limit magazine capacities, Ban certain frame metals. ban lead bullets. ban certain style features. Force new “drop tests” on them.
Now, require microstamping of all handguns! make it illegal to have a non microstamped firearm. Nibble, nibble nibble.
It never ends.
11
posted on
05/17/2013 7:29:04 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
To: ConservativeInPA
This is as much about paperworking and captial-draining the manufacturers that have to adapt this and potentially sell a California Version and a Non-California Version.
Frig-Um, If I was a Hand-Gun Manufacturer I'd pull out of this market and any other that enacts this encroaching insanity.
12
posted on
05/17/2013 7:31:44 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
To: taildragger
Gun manufacturers are already paying a yearly extortion fee to CA to be on the gun roster, aka, Safe Gun List. What an effing oxymoron.
13
posted on
05/17/2013 7:34:34 PM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
(Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
To: Joe 6-pack
>> “Or buy a revolver...” <<
.
Or just put a dab of clear laquer on the base of the cartridge.
Anyone wishing to do something nefarious could do any number of things, thus the statute is feckless toward its stated purpose.
Criminals break laws without compunction daily.
14
posted on
05/17/2013 7:35:11 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: ConservativeInPA
I doubt that there ever will be a “straw that broke the camels back” in Californicate before universal government mandated involuntary servitude is implemented there.
15
posted on
05/17/2013 7:35:44 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(IRS/Obamacare Death Panels selection criteria ....Tea Party, Patriot, 9/12, Constitution,...)
To: ConservativeInPA
16
posted on
05/17/2013 7:46:57 PM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
(Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
To: ConservativeInPA
I don't own or plan to buy a semiauto handgun, but if a class action suit against the dystopic, Late Great State of California is organized, I would like to join, both nominally and financially.
The power to "register," as we are seeing currently with "the power to tax," is the power to destroy.
17
posted on
05/17/2013 7:50:06 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: ConservativeInPA
Do revolvers have to have microstamping too?
18
posted on
05/17/2013 7:50:30 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to detonate anyone who says otherwise.)
To: ConservativeInPA
And they thought the San Andreas was a major fault line...
19
posted on
05/17/2013 7:51:18 PM PDT
by
One Name
(Ultimately, the TRUTH is a razor's edge and no man can sit astride it.)
Microstamp THIS bitches!
20
posted on
05/17/2013 7:51:40 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson