Posted on 05/16/2013 11:32:16 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
Holder admitted that there was no non-verbal record of the recusal...
Holder suggested that there is room for a better federal policy governing recusal, apparently unaware of what’s already on the books. 28 USC Chapter 40 states:
Before personally making any other determination under this chapter with respect to information received under this chapter, the Attorney General shall determine under paragraph (1)(B) whether recusal is necessary. The Attorney General shall set forth this determination in writing, identify the facts considered by the Attorney General, and set forth the reasons for the recusal.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Pretty good, huh?
Holder may be a commie bastard, but he's a clever commie bastard.
“Holder gave VERBAL recusal, and can’t remember when he gave it”
Then I guess it didn’t happen.
That's certainly the way government auditors treat healthcare professionals and everyone else they audit. If you didn't document, it didn't happen.
Yeah, it’s either an ongoing investigation or a personnel matter where privacy is protected. Ever notice how privacy laws only protect government?
That's what I'm thinking. How can this hold any water? It contradicts the law, as shown above.
This carries as much weight as a "high hosie."
All Muzzies have to do is say, “I recuse me” three times and they are recused.
Gads, these people are all suffering from early onset Alzheimers. In that case, they shouldn’t be in positions of power at all...actually, this group should be in jail.
Arrest him.
We are in the midst of a constitutional crises.
Hmmmm...
Etc., ad infinitum.
You will hear it a thousand times.
But they will never tell the truth --that this is a bogus, unlawful, non-existent, "verbal recusal."
Everywhere I have worked if it wasn’t on paper, it didn’t happen. Same with any business you deal with now as a customer. Anything I do over the phone I tell them I want it documented and then make them read it back to me.
I’m with you. Congress should just tell him....if its not documented it didn’t happen.
I can’t decide whether Holder is a human body with a rat face, or a rat with a human body. But one thing is certain .... he is a pathological liar.
What is Holder, a Supreme court judge or something?
He doesn’t Recuse KRAP!
He is responsible for the wiretaps, as well as anything else the dept of injustice does. He is NOT judging anything. “Recusal” would be him making up a new meaning for a well-defined word that bears NOTHING on the current situation.
Why should anyone expect an affirmative action skater know the laws of the USA?
Head counts of the right people are way more important than knowledge and qualifications.
Levin brought this up yesterday and it is a viciously controlling point. Holder is lying.
Thats the way the IRS works....
There is no such legal action as an unwritten recusal.
Holder is legally liable for all DOJ actions, associated with the AG.
The wheels are coming off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
