Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obtaining AP phone records required Holder’s approval
Washingtonexaminer ^

Posted on 05/14/2013 10:48:34 AM PDT by chessplayer

The DOJ’s U.S. Attorneys’ Manual is quite clear on this point:

The Attorney General’s authorization is normally required before the issuance of any subpoena to a member of the news media or for the telephone toll records of a member of the news media. However, in those cases where the media member or his or her representative agrees to provide the material sought and that material has been published or broadcast, the United States Attorney or the responsible Assistant Attorney General may authorize issuance of the subpoena, thereafter submitting a report to the Office of Public Affairs detailing the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the subpoena….

Because this probe was secret, the second condition was not met, meaning that Holder’s approval was necessary. The manual goes on to explain:

Department attorneys seeking the Attorney General’s authorization to issue a subpoena to a member of the news media, or for telephone toll records of a media member, must submit a written request summarizing the facts of the prosecution or investigation, explaining the essentiality of the information sought to the investigation or prosecution, describing attempts to obtain the voluntary cooperation of the news media through negotiation and explaining how the proposed subpoena will be fashioned as narrowly as possible to obtain the necessary information in a manner as minimally intrusive and burdensome as possible.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ap; criminalgovernment; democrats; doj; dojphonescandal; govtabuse; holder; holderphonescandal; tyranny; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2013 10:48:34 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
HOLDER VIOLATED AP'S FIRST AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS.
2 posted on 05/14/2013 10:50:05 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mandatory BB Guns for 10 Year Old Boys would solve most of America's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Time to get Holder’s impeachment papers ready. That corrupt bastard needs to go.


3 posted on 05/14/2013 10:50:39 AM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Rush nailed it early this afternoon: if they would have asked, the AP would have gladly GIVEN this information to Obama.


4 posted on 05/14/2013 10:50:51 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
None of the scandals revealed in the past week are any worse than those of the first term. Why does the MSM suddenly find them important?
5 posted on 05/14/2013 10:53:13 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

In going after the laughably partisan media, Holder is definitely hammering the goose that lays the golden eggs.


6 posted on 05/14/2013 10:54:33 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Perhaps this is just a gentle reminder of who owns who?

I hope Sally Sweelies likes very rough sex, she's gonna get a lot of it!

(This picture was taken back when the relationship was more, how shall I put it?, consensual)

I suspect AP will find that Obama, Holder and Co. can make Castro* look like a saint...

*Ariel, Fidel, whatever...

7 posted on 05/14/2013 10:54:57 AM PDT by null and void (The motto of all liberals is "Using your guilt and your gelt we can get away with anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Wanna bet that approval authorization form will be missing in action.


8 posted on 05/14/2013 10:55:53 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama's Chechens are coming home...to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
None of the scandals revealed in the past week are any worse than those of the first term. Why does the MSM suddenly find them important?

Because it involves them. It is the same reason why a reporter in a war zone is an international hero to them while a soldier means little. Because it is one of theirs.

9 posted on 05/14/2013 10:57:36 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMug
10 posted on 05/14/2013 10:58:09 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Because now it’s their credibility on the line. They carried the water for Obama and now he’s turning on them. The first law of a Leftist is to get rid of the ones that got you into power because they’re the ones who know where the bodies are buried that’ll sink you.


11 posted on 05/14/2013 10:58:32 AM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
I don't recall a more corrupt, in the spot light, Attorney General in US history.

Seems like all of Obama’s executive power grabs go straight through him.

12 posted on 05/14/2013 10:58:40 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Second American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

“The Attorney General’s authorization is normally required”


DOJ can say this wasn’t a normal case.


13 posted on 05/14/2013 11:00:00 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

He is trying to claim in live presser now that he recused himself from AP case months ago....he is lying.


14 posted on 05/14/2013 11:00:18 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL

You make a good point.
Several FReepers have mentioned that the Dems have ceased to consider Republicans as a threat and are beginning their internal purges like Stalin did.


15 posted on 05/14/2013 11:01:04 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

What were they looking for at AP?


16 posted on 05/14/2013 11:03:05 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
The Obama administration doesn't respect or adhere to proper authority or chains of command. I'm betting that Obama, Holder, and Clinton ran very loose ships where subordinates were allowed to issue orders whether they had the clearance to or not.

-PJ

17 posted on 05/14/2013 11:04:00 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Apparently, the claim is that Holder recused himself from approving the subpoena because he had already testified to Congress about the leak that was supposedly at the center of the request.

Now they will try to to say that because he recused himself, he was not responsible and had no knowledge. But that is not the case. In order to recuse himself, he had to know about the subpoena in the first place. Just because he did not actually sign the actual subpoena request does not absolve him of all knowledge and responsibility in the situation.


18 posted on 05/14/2013 11:05:45 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Who was leaking WH information. Otoh they ignored the 3-4 staff members related to executives in the MSM


19 posted on 05/14/2013 11:06:38 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
We blame aliens.

 photo Aliens_zps647ee75c.jpg
20 posted on 05/14/2013 11:08:44 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson