In my opinion, the entire reason Obama chose to blame the "anti-Islamic video" for this crime is simply this: Obama is a Muslim himself and he didn't want Islam exposed for what it is.
He quickly moved on from the Boston Marathon bombers when it became known there were Muslims.
Only the CoC could have ordered EUCOM and AFRICOM to "stand down" from their military missions. Fast movers over the embassy (two F-16s from Aviano Italy could have been there quickly (VERY QUICKLY) would have stopped the attackers - they would have fled at the sound of afterburner 100' off the ground. Trust me. The fighters could have utilized KC-10s and KC-135s that were already on orbit for in-flight refueling and made the trip from Aviano to Libya without landing.
This stinks to high heaven. But as Neal Boortz wrote today, this won't have the same impact as Watergate because:
1. The News media won't allow it
2. Millions of Americans today don't care: they just want their Social Security Disability check, their Section 8 voucher, their unemployment check, and their EBT card.
It has been a source of amazement to me that although many of us have known of this violation since it happened that none of the news sources (including FNC) would even hint at this horror.
If Michael Savage told me the sun rose in the east, I’d need a couple more independent sources.
Someone remind this idiot that some of us disabled people actually care.
Hannity mentioned earlier that a bayonette was used.
Keep in mind .... Obama doesn’t see sodomy as a BAD thing ... he considers it to be an expression of LOVE.
I might be mistaken but I think I remember this was widely reported...
Here is what is worse.
There were UAV’s in the sky, flying over Libya.
They were armed. They were being used by Obama to ‘assasinate’ whatever group refused to go along with the Muslim Brotherhood.
He could have used them to help/save the Ambassador and crew.
He didn’t because it would prove the UAV’s are armed, and both he and the Libyan government told the public they weren’t armed.