Pretty much what I’d expect fom the craven NYT...
Only the New York Times could call the rape and murder of American diplomats and soldiers “partisan.” There is no cure to the Liberal mind.
Couldn’t have the golden boy getting into a messy war on the verge of an election. The war crimes to depose Momar Gaddafi were bad enough.
Yes, Virginia, America is dead.
Papering it over aren’t they?
What else could be expected.
So much for this being a watershed event... no coverage. Only conservatives in the blogosphere will be aware the hearing even happened. Without the media to whip the sheeple into a frenzy of outrage NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN HERE.
Just like F and F, these poor guys that testified have stuck their necks out for nothing.... and they will soon be chopped off at the knees and be ruined.
The worse news, honest people who know things will be even more unwilling to stick their necks out.
I hate to be negative but this is a busted balloon today.
Is “Scott Shane” the pseudonym for Jay Carney.
Just like a big steaming pile of dog crap sitting on the front poarch of America. ny slimes... may it and everyone that works there burn in hell for eternity.
LLS
“is expected to testify that a far more aggressive American military response could have been mounted on the night of the attack. “
This is journalism? He seems to imply there existed some sort of military response. There was nothing. While Americans fought for their lives and died horrifically, there was nothing.
They would have been happy for *any* military response, not just a “far more aggressive” one. We are lucky they weren’t completely overrun with 30+ KIA.
Ehhh....it’s the New York Times. What else would you expect from them?
This is the Onion, pretending to be the NYT, right?
Actually, I’m surprised that the NYT can spell Benghazi.
washed n hung out to dry
A congress woman just said on the Hanity show that the military was prepared to go but was told to put down, also she said that the democrats were made to look so bad they were mad, they would not even let her use their phone.
NYT is lucky they don’t require a license to exercise their first amendment rights .... none of them could pass a background check for mental compentency!!!!
Well, the NYTimes can always be counted on to do the Devil’s dirty work as they have once again done here.
Nothing more than partisan politics that’s all.
There will be justice, in this world or the next for these evil doers.
CNN pundit just called for an outside investigation of the Cleveland Police.
Same for Benghazi or Boston Bombing? => not so much, nah!
Obama got re-elected, so “what difference does it make”. Absolutely none at all, at least not to the MSM>
Is this reporting or just regurgitating of Democrat talking points? Oh, it’s the NYSlimes, so regurgitating of Democrat talking points is what they pass off as “reporting.”
They’re usually less blatant about it, though...