You have to be in denial to be a Leftist in the first place.
1 posted on
05/06/2013 6:54:36 AM PDT by
walford
To: walford
2 posted on
05/06/2013 6:59:21 AM PDT by
deadrock
To: walford
Liberals are the ass puppets of Satan.
To: walford
100%!!!
4 posted on
05/06/2013 7:04:22 AM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: walford
We're talking liberals here... remember they talk in circles. Thus, no matter the plethora of factual data put in front of their faces, there must be a Stage 6:
Anger: Whoever did this was obviously a right wing, Tea Party-affiliated, patriot, militant, white, religious, Republican, tax-protesting, NRA-loving gun nut.
5 posted on
05/06/2013 7:06:42 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
To: walford
As our morning drive talk show host
Jim Quinn likes to say: "Liberalism is the act of standing on your head and telling the rest of the world that its upside down."
6 posted on
05/06/2013 7:09:23 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: walford
I am waiting for the YouTube excuse.
7 posted on
05/06/2013 7:10:04 AM PDT by
magellan
To: walford
Something else also-
How many times after the attack do you hear in the media something like this:
“Sources are telling us”
“An FBI official who spoke on condition af annonymity has said -—— because they are not allowed to speak about it.”
Are all of the sources and the info checked for accuracy or are these things that are being spewed out as fact not even true?
Also, If people within the FBI, State Department etc... are not supposed to talk about these things, then why are they doing so? Shouldn’t they be searched out and fired?
8 posted on
05/06/2013 7:10:48 AM PDT by
DOGHEAD
To: walford
9 posted on
05/06/2013 7:13:25 AM PDT by
lowbridge
To: walford
This was an isolated incident of lone wolf terrorism unconnected to anything that could possibly imply that the Obama administration had let down its guard or overlooked obvious signs of imminent attack by an international terrorist conspiracy.I would like to point out the Boston attack was the first successful bombing on American soil since 9/11.
I don't know if anybody else remembers 9/12, but the universal assumption at the time was that we would have to accustom ourselves to an ongoing wave of attacks, even if less spectacular. As in multiple bombings per year, and possibly per month.
In actual fact, of course, we went more than 11.5 years before the next successful bombing.
Given that there are at minimum some tens of millions out there who want to blow us up, I think that's a pretty damn good record. And I am offended at those who slander those fighting off our attackers by claiming the only possible way an attack could have gotten through was because those defenders were incompetent or complicity.
A good chunk of the world wants us dead. It is unreasonable to expect that none of their attempts will get through.
To: walford
13 posted on
05/06/2013 7:22:25 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: walford
To: walford
It was a series of man-caused sports-related injuries
Notice how they drop the gender neutrality when it comes to anything bad. MAN-made tragedy, MAN-made climate change, mad MAN, hit MAN, etc. instead of something more PC like HUMAN-made tragedy. A Freudian slip? Or they assume we're too stooped and ignernt to notice the transparent attempt at subliminal MANipulation, no pun intended?
16 posted on
05/06/2013 8:10:58 AM PDT by
Impala64ssa
(You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
To: walford
I think #5 should be “Rename the Act to obfuscate”.
18 posted on
05/06/2013 8:20:49 AM PDT by
coldoc
To: walford
My liberal Mass. acquaintance went through roughly three phases:
1. Not a muslim because the Saudi was absolutely innocent
2. Hope it's a foreign terrorist because homegrown terrorists are much worse (?),
3. Complete silence.
20 posted on
05/06/2013 8:28:38 AM PDT by
palmer
(Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
To: walford
They are running these ‘BOSTON STRONG’ ads everywhere across Gay England...this bombing really damaged their self-esteem, and it is going to be a struggle to get it back.
22 posted on
05/06/2013 8:31:55 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: walford
“the five stages of liberal grief”
1. Lying
2. Lying
3. Lying
4. Lying
5. Lying
and
6-100. Lying
To: walford
Stage 6 - Blame- The bombing was obviously the fault of evil conservatives for taking away their welfare. How could two poor children from Chechnya be expected to integrate into the US? They should have been guaranteed welfare and food stamps and Medicaid and government housing for their whole lives.
24 posted on
05/06/2013 9:01:26 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: walford
I think I have actually heard this #6 being media tested by Libertards;
Stage 6 - Equivalence: Terroristic behavior in Islam is exactly like what the Southern Poverty Law Center sees happening in racist white conservative groups. Therefore this attack is the equivalent of an attack by right wingnuts, it is just that they did not choose to do it that day.
25 posted on
05/06/2013 9:32:09 AM PDT by
SES1066
(Government is NOT the reason for my existence but it is the road to our ruin!)
To: walford
28 posted on
05/06/2013 12:20:30 PM PDT by
Daffynition
(Stand Your Ground)
To: walford
When we hear these Lib talking points, we just have to chant, “BEN GHA ZI, BEN GHA ZI, BEN GHA ZI, until they shut up and go away!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson