The MSM has resisted investigating Benghazi to shield Clinton more than Obama.
The woman loves pantsuits...I’m thinking a bright orange one, or maybe go retro with black and white strips and accessorize with an ankle manacle with ball and chain.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
It troubles me that someone who (apparently) has less of an alleged conscience than Edward (I decline to use the familiar "Teddy") Kennedy wants to be our president.
.
Is Barack's foreign policy erectile dysfunction smacking voters in the face yet?
The LSM will protect her yet again.
Our only hope in 2016 is that the Republican party doesn't run another loser.
What bothers me is that Petraeus participated in the cover-up, after he was outed as an adulterer.
Let’s be very careful here. I’ve never believed the coverup was designed to protect Obama’s “we’ve got them on the run” political meme, and overtly providing arms to Syrian rebels wouldn’t have bothered anyone. No, they’re protecting something bigger than that, and something that Patraeus would be on board for.
What mission was Benghazi part of that would unite the three of them, Obama, Hillary, and Gen Petraeus? I don’t think funneling weapons to Syria would have accomplished this. Whatever it was, Petraeus was brought on board specifically for this mission, IMHO. The heavy CIA presence in Benghazi says a lot.
Who else could have used some American weaponry, that may wish to overthrow their government? Why was Turkey involved?
Hillary, it might have been right at the end... but you knew your place under the Obama bus was coming.
Hillary has taken responsibility for the security, but no one has taken responsibility for the cover up - the false videotape story and the scrubbing of the talking points to eliminate references to al Qaeda.