I admit I've been back and forth on this, and THIS report puts me more solidly in the "something's up" category.
The official statements and media reporting of the Benghazi attacks were filled with misinformation, distortion, denials, and the promise of a full investigation.
The official statements and media reporting of the Sandy Hook school attack were filled with misinformation, distortion, denials, and the promise of a full investigation.
The official statements and media reporting of the Boston Marathon attack were filled with misinformation, distortion, denials, and the promise of a full investigation.
How many dots does one have to connect before one sees a pattern developing?
Nearly
moments after the Boston Marathon bomb explosions, the local and national news reporters made reference to information coming 'from Washington' for various reports and updates.
From Washington? All of the sudden, the local officials were deferring to Washington for releasing information.
Additionally, in one of the late evening pressers, one of the speakers made reference to them 'searching throughout the world, to the ends of the earth' to apprehend those involved. I thought that rather strange since the common spiel all day was 'no sign of terrorism' and 'the lone bomber' and probably a right-wing skinhead rather than a radicalized muslim. I suspect that that speaker at the presser already knew international terrorist ties were involved.