Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Your post is a classic example of “assuming the consequent” - you interpret the evidence through an assumption, then say that the evidence proves that assumption.

You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that.


164 posted on 05/01/2013 5:29:05 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
MrB: "Your post is a classic example of “assuming the consequent” - you interpret the evidence through an assumption, then say that the evidence proves that assumption."

Your post is a classic example of psychological projection -- you assert in others what you fear most in yourself.

The fact of both your examples is: there's no -- zero, zip, nada -- valid scientific data to justify "young earthers' " claims, period.

MrB: "You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that."

You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that, FRiend.

;-)

168 posted on 05/01/2013 6:23:51 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson