Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kimtom
kimtom post #3: "...fossilization (mineralization) does not take long at all (decades) (longer for more complete)."

BJK post #117: "...So your basic assumption — that organic material must always fossilize or quickly decompose — is, well, unwarranted....”"

kimtom post #125: "where did I say this??? “always” “quickly”?
Bias and assumptions..."

But your argument -- that soft dino-tissue "proves" a young-earth -- can only possibly be valid if all organic tissues fossilize or quickly decompose.
Since that is not the case, your argument is necessarily, well, unwarranted, FRiend.

;-)

128 posted on 04/30/2013 5:35:42 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
“”..But your argument — that soft dino-tissue “proves” a young-earth — can {only possibly be valid if all} organic tissues fossilize or quickly decompose.
Since that is not the case, your argument is necessarily, well, unwarranted, FRiend....””

You cannot use False Logic. (If Then)

Your whole argument is from the standpoint that evolution is true, therefore, soft tissue does not cast a doubt on “millions” of year “theology”.
it may be perplexing, but evolutionist (aside from science) will explain this away (sweep aside- as you are attempting to do).

I do not claim that soft tissue (itself) proves YE. But I do say That it Supports a YE model over a Billion YO model.

136 posted on 04/30/2013 6:54:15 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson