Replies

“”..But your argument — that soft dino-tissue “proves” a young-earth — can {only possibly be valid if all} organic tissues fossilize or quickly decompose.
Since that is not the case, your argument is necessarily, well, unwarranted, FRiend....””

You cannot use False Logic. (If Then)

Your whole argument is from the standpoint that evolution is true, therefore, soft tissue does not cast a doubt on “millions” of year “theology”.
it may be perplexing, but evolutionist (aside from science) will explain this away (sweep aside- as you are attempting to do).

I do not claim that soft tissue (itself) proves YE. But I do say That it Supports a YE model over a Billion YO model.

kimtom: "You cannot use False Logic. (If Then)"

Sorry, but all of my arguments are true, and your responses are false, FRiend. ;-)

kimtom: "{a bunch of gobbledygook}"

kimtom: "I do not claim that soft tissue (itself) proves YE.
But I do say That it Supports a YE model over a Billion YO model."

Reports of soft tissue come from dinosaur fossils circa 100 million years old.
The hard evidence for dating fossils comes from numerous radio-metric analyses, none of which have ever been proved to be grossly in error.
But even without radio-metric dating, there is no conceivable scientific "young earth" explanation for the many thousands of feet of geological strata that we all sit on top of -- or even Antarctic ice cores dating back hundreds of thousands of years.