Posted on 04/28/2013 12:41:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Thats the simple reality of Fridays vote to ease the pain for the Federal Aviation Administration. By assenting to it, Democrats have agreed to sequestration for the foreseeable future.
In effect, what Democrats said Friday was that in any case where the political pain caused by sequestration becomes unbearable, they will agree to cancel that particular piece of the bill while leaving the rest of the law untouched. The result is that sequestration is no longer particularly politically threatening, but its even more unbalanced: Cuts to programs used by the politically powerful will be addressed, but cuts to programs that affects the politically powerless will persist. Its worth saying this clearly: The pain of sequestration will be concentrated on those who lack political power.
Democrats had other choices, of course. As Politicos Glenn Thrush pointed out on MSNBC Friday, President Obama couldve vetoed the FAA bill while standing at a Head Start thats about to throw needy children out of the program. He couldve vetoed it from the home of an jobless worker who just saw her benefits cut.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Not to worry. If they pass amnesty, there will be no Rs left of ANY stripe.
Judge them by their actions.
/bingo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.