Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Planned Parenthood says Obama is the first sitting president [evil-willed enough] to address the group in person."
1 posted on 04/26/2013 8:56:24 AM PDT by mlizzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: mlizzy

Why I hate Obama’s guts. Always has to demonize those on the other side.


2 posted on 04/26/2013 8:57:16 AM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Women “on their own” don’t get pregnant.


3 posted on 04/26/2013 8:57:32 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

GOD I wish we could turn the clock back...to before bathhouse Barry came along.


4 posted on 04/26/2013 8:57:35 AM PDT by Marathoner (Anyone who believes in liberty and the Constitution has almost zero representation in DC today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

I saw a bright purple Planned Parenthood billboard on the way into work this morning. I was disgusted. They show all these young women frolicking and having fun. Absolutely disgusting.


5 posted on 04/26/2013 8:57:45 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Obama wants to return us to an era even before the 1950s....the 1940s era of gas chambers and work camps ala “Arbeit Macht Frei” [only for conservatives and infidels]


6 posted on 04/26/2013 8:57:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Like the tv & radio commercials depicting the horrors of cigarette smoking, they should show the horror of abortion also.


8 posted on 04/26/2013 9:00:32 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Ol’ Doc Gosnell, Barry’s pal, and possibly future cellmate, certainly took abortion back to the 1950s ~ and made us remember Gilles de Rais


10 posted on 04/26/2013 9:01:30 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

I’ll bet the unborn would like a return to the 50’s, too.

May Bath-House Barry continually swim in an afterlife toilet trying to get out.


11 posted on 04/26/2013 9:01:52 AM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy
Damn Right I do Ubama you Putz!!

I consider the 1950's to the Height of American Civilization (Although I think 1969 when we put a Man on the moon to the height of Human Civilization in General)


12 posted on 04/26/2013 9:01:54 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

I would love to turn back to the 1950s, except for the fact that they were followed by the 1960s.


13 posted on 04/26/2013 9:02:36 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

How about, before we argue about rolling the country’s morality back to the ‘50’s,

we agree that inducing labor, having women deliver viable babies, and then barbarically killing them,

should be illegal under the laws of a moral nation...

How about that, Barry?


14 posted on 04/26/2013 9:02:45 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Ridding our once-great nation of the scourge of murdering innocent babies would be the greatest thing imaginable. This genocide is nearly as large as the ones committed by totalitarians in the 20th century. Putting an end to the death cult of democrats would be a great start to restoring morality to our nation.


15 posted on 04/26/2013 9:03:02 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

What a depraved evil it is when birth control requires the murder and butchering of a baby.


16 posted on 04/26/2013 9:03:10 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

17 posted on 04/26/2013 9:03:26 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Less than one percent of abortions are for rape, incest, or medical necessity. Given a choice between “telling women they’re on their own” and have to pay for the costs resulting from their own hobbies, or telling the babies they are on their own and the government will pay for their murder, I’ll go with cutting Planned Parenthood off. That is a whole lot more civilized than cutting the baby’s head off.


18 posted on 04/26/2013 9:03:41 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

From a blog:

During the 1950s, the economy was booming...

*the GDP grew by 250%
*average incomes tripled
*the housing market was booming
*developers were building 1.5 million homes per year
*Home ownership rates exploded
*60% of Americans were in the middle class category
*Poverty rates were dropping fast
*Consumer spending doubled in the 1950s
*Divorce rates were low, while marriage rates were high and people married at a younger age than at any other time in history
*Only 4% of all babies were born out-of-wedlock, compared to 40% today
*90% of all children grew up with married parents
*there was no crack epidemic yet
*there were hardly any school shootings
*90% of all school levies were approved by voters
*discipline problems in school minor
*the US had the best educational system in the world at the time
*cost of living was low
*families were able to live comfortably on only one income
*Americans viewed the home and the family to be most important thing in society
*No secular humanist movement opposed the 1954 addition of “under God” to the Pledge of Alligence

Yeah, us cro-magons don’t like Obama’s changes. But then, we are a lot smarter than the Zero trained coming out of schools now.


19 posted on 04/26/2013 9:05:04 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends



Please Support PRO-LIFE Free Republic!!!

20 posted on 04/26/2013 9:05:34 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

It’s so much better now that viable infants can be killed with impunity, that the rape and in some cases conception from forced prostitution of children and teens is covered up, that women undergoing abortion can be killed, and that 55,000,000 people never came into being which would have helped this country survive.


21 posted on 04/26/2013 9:07:30 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

1997: opposed bill preventing partial-birth abortion

In 1997, Obama voted in the Illinois Senate against SB 230, a bill designed to prevent partial-birth abortions. In the US Senate, Obama has consistently voted to expand embryonic stem cell research. He has voted against requiring minors who get out-of-state abortions to notify their parents. The National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) gives Obama a 100% score on his pro-choice voting record in the Senate for 2005, 2006, and 2007.

Source: Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi, p.238-239 Aug 1, 2008

Opposed legislation protecting born-alive failed abortions

Obama has consistently refused to support legislation that would define an infant who survives a late-term induced-labor abortion as a human being with the right to live. He insists that no restriction must ever be placed on the right of a mother to decide to abort her child.

On March 30, 2001, Obama was the only Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would “forbid abortions to take place.” Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, “then this would be an anti-abortion statute.”

Source: Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi, p.238 Aug 1, 2008


22 posted on 04/26/2013 9:07:49 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

I know, I know this is wrong and the man up stairs will strike me down but sometimes I think why are we banging our heads worrying about THEIR babies when they don’t?


23 posted on 04/26/2013 9:08:46 AM PDT by ryan71 (The republican party is dead to me. Dead. Don't bother trying to revive it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson