WhiteHouse refuses to deny that Obama Phones were used in the Boston Bombings
1 posted on
04/25/2013 3:33:48 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
To: NoLibZone
2 posted on
04/25/2013 3:34:38 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: NoLibZone
It's amazing how far the country has gone down in five years.
Intel screw-ups, immigration screw-ups, and now giving these people welfare and phones???
To: NoLibZone
"I hear from law enforcement that these phones are often found at crime scenes and are used in drug deals," said Rep. Tim Griffin (R-AK). "Why? It's because you can't trace them." Of course you can trace them. A given serial number to a given recipient. The purchased pay-as-you-go phones, OTOH, can be a problem.
5 posted on
04/25/2013 3:43:47 PM PDT by
steve86
(Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
To: NoLibZone
Also give them Obamabombs. Just kill us quick.
6 posted on
04/25/2013 3:46:56 PM PDT by
ravager
(I)
To: NoLibZone
Answer: They probably did.
7 posted on
04/25/2013 3:52:30 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: NoLibZone
Its state-sponsored terrorism.
Only now its our state sponsoring the terrorists
8 posted on
04/25/2013 3:53:13 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: NoLibZone
I wish they were as concerned about regular Americans’ privacy as they are the terrorists.
To: NoLibZone
Did he get the Mercedes for free as well? Do you have to be a terrorist to get one?
To: NoLibZone
since when do terrorists qualify for privacy protection?
15 posted on
04/25/2013 4:03:54 PM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: NoLibZone; All
Constitution-respecting patriots can point out that Congress cannot use any clause in Section 8 of Article I to justify laying taxes so that feds can fund phones given to the public.
To: NoLibZone
The fact that they refuse to answer—pretty much answers the question for me.
19 posted on
04/25/2013 4:14:36 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: NoLibZone
‘Wonder if his obama phone was used to detonate the devices.
21 posted on
04/25/2013 4:16:51 PM PDT by
rsobin
To: NoLibZone
So we should assume the bombs were set off by tax money Obama welfare phones until they prove otherwise. Time to start using their outrageous tactics. Right now we can say the administration will not confirm or deny this. So lets say it loudly.
22 posted on
04/25/2013 4:24:57 PM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
( EVERY DIME Obama Spends is given to him by the Republicans in the House.)
To: NoLibZone
Wow...just kick us in the nads one more time...if the phones used to denote the Boston bombs were in fact "Obamaphones"
It's become mind-boggling...
24 posted on
04/25/2013 4:38:34 PM PDT by
Popman
(Godlessness is always the first step to the concentration camp.)
To: NoLibZone
Note to FCC:
You waited too long to say no.
To: NoLibZone
It’s all for privacy concerns you know.
31 posted on
04/25/2013 4:52:51 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: NoLibZone
34 posted on
04/25/2013 5:09:21 PM PDT by
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil.)
To: NoLibZone
But Obama is happy to declare executive orders that over rule privacy laws so he can grab your guns.
35 posted on
04/25/2013 5:25:22 PM PDT by
mylife
(Opinions $1, Half Baked 50c)
To: NoLibZone
We need the Obamaphone gal to add terrorists on to her list of qualifiers. LOL
37 posted on
04/25/2013 5:30:46 PM PDT by
dforest
(I have now entered the Twilight Zone.)
To: NoLibZone
I will interpret their silence to mean “yes”.
40 posted on
04/26/2013 11:05:41 AM PDT by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
