Posted on 04/21/2013 5:59:47 PM PDT by Jayster
Glen Beck has claimed that he has proof the federal government has covered up the Boston bombing as being carried out by Chechnya terrorists. He says that the bombing was actually carried out by Saudi nationals and that he has the evidence to prove it. He gives Obama until Monday to admit it or his show will reveal the evidence. Is this just to get extra attention or does he have something more? Glenn Beck has always done a great job at laying out facts in his arguments, but we will see. We do however know that on Monday an anonymous source said that the raids would happen on Friday and obviously that already came true. There is a lot of suspicious things surrounding the Boston bombings, but is it just conspiracy theories at work again?
I’m with you, this is truly a defining moment in what has been a very well intentioned effort up until this time. He either becomes the next Woodward/Bernstein or Alex Jones/Joseph Farrah.
He made a HUGE claim and better put up or shut up and go away.
Does anybody know what it was the Saudi did that made witnesses tackle him and police to be guarding him in the hospital?
Good info. Thanks!
Are you serious or joking?
“distinguish what the truth they speak is, and when it is part of the “show”.”
nice synopsis of the leading hosts “marketing” strategies.
I just get tired of it once in a while....
That’s what I was thinking as well.
“I’ll say this, if Beck ends up having nothing on Monday then I will never pay attention to a single word he says. His crediblity will be gone.”
What, if he is all hype again? He’s done this many times before.
Beck often been very close to revealing inconvenient truths and somehow has routinely blown it being a cross between Clyde Barnum and the village idiot.
Maybe Monday he can redeem himself, then again maybe he will have another wildeyed continuing saga to tell.
I just watched the video of Beck and he seems dead serious. You don’t level charges like that against the WH unless you have the goods. O must be smokin’ up a storm.
Where did you see it?
It is on the link
It’s on you tube
A blogger on MODAY said he/she was working on a security commission. He/she was working on some upcoming campaign. After the bombing, he/she figured out what was going on, and what it was he/she was helping with.
He claimed - on MONDAY (the day of bombing) - they'd pick a late teen or early 20 year old. The raid to catch the culprit(s) was scheduled for Friday. He/she said the staged attack was designed to target gun power. Without gun powder, our 2nd amendment is useless.
Everything happened exactly as he/she said, and the democrats quietly added taxing and regulating gun powder as an amendment to the gun debate.
This could explain why the MSM is silent about the weapons the boys were suppose to have, and how or where they got them. They're no longer after the guns. They're after the gun powder.
I don’t think it’s “either/or”. It’s both Chechens *and* Saudis.
The House Committee on Homeland Security on Sunday emailed TheBlaze a copy of their request to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for more information on the Saudi national originally described as a “person of interest” in the Boston Marathon bombing.
The Saudi national — originally identified as Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi — has been the topic of fierce debate in recent days, after he was reportedly set to be deported under section 212 3B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) – “Security and related grounds” – “Terrorist activities,” after the bombing.
The story gained a curious twist when, after it gained more traction, President & Chief Content Officer for TheBlaze Joel Cheatwood received word from one of his investigative reporters that “there is now discussion that they may not allow this man to be deported.”
The police must have the terrorist guns.
The guns have serial numbers.
Who provided the guns - the Saudi prince?
I believe those criticizing Beck dont actually listen to Beck.
He has brought so much to the forefront. Who ever hear of Van Jones before Beck called him out? Or Al Gore’s Chicago Climate Exchange nefarious plan? Or the crash of the housing bubble (he predicted that almost a year before it occurred). He is NOT clairvoyant—he has a staff the does serious research. Three or more verified sources for EVERY story. How many other talk show hosts sometimes seen to just be reading straight from Drudge?
His latest journalistic exposé expanded upon the work Michelle Malkin has done on CCore (manipulations of historical facts via text book edits/revisions).
He has been all over Ben Gazi...
And whe. I heard his audio on Friday, my blood went cold. And Friday night, while all those Federal agents were risking their lives right along with Boston PD, I couldn’t help but think the vast majority of these professionals are in Law Enforcement because of the profound decency they have; not some deluded party affiation loyalty. This types are who I believe contact Glenn.
Well learn of his exclusive tomorrow. G-d be with Glenn and keep him safe!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.