Full title: Barney Frank on the Boston bombing: Let this serve as a reminder to you, smaller government tax cut zealots!
He really just doesn’t get it.
Franks always sounds like he has a couple of hot dogs in his mouth.
government didnt do sh1t.
people across the entire spectrum did.
it will ever be a blank check barney. up your fat gerbil-loving ass.
Then Barney needs to explain why the Obama administration has slashed the budget for domestic bombing prevention in half.
How did that prevent the bombings, Mr. Rump Ranger?
I read that we have about 6 million Muslims in America. If only one tenth of one percent, 6,000, are radical to the point of carrying out individual acts of terror, we are in for a long dark string of horrors. Take the radicals, along with cartel members and other malcontents and ask this of Barney: Who let them in?
You can always count on Bawney to say something really, really stupid.
Conservatives on this board would LOVE to spend 2X to 3X on border control and 2X to 3X LESS on social programs, doesn;t dip-shiite barney understand this...
Levin put it nicely last night, Conservatives WANT Nation government for National defense, even if it is “Big” as long as it is well ran and efficient and actually protects the borders!!!
Hey Barney, fat, drunk and perverted is no way to go through life.
We're talking about social programs....not security.
Stunning stupidity: If the biggest government the world has ever seen has a larger problem with terrorism than most other smaller governments, it defies every rule of logic to conclude that an even bigger government could possibly reduce terrorism.
The logic and facts leave no room for doubt or argument: Terrorism is positively correlated with abusive, tyrannical, oppressive government. And tyrannical government is positively correlated with bigger government having greater powers and fewer constraints.
Did Barney had-to-be-Frank-cause-he-ain’t-worth-Beans miss the fact that untold Billion$ spent on Big Government “Homeland Security” failed to stop 3 bombs yesterday? I doubt that the wounded and the families of the dead see that as a success.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Did somebody actually up and shrink the government while I was looking the other way or something? Massachusetts is no example of governmental frugality. If size of government had anything to do with this attack it would be a failure of large bureacracy, since that’s all that was in any way associated with that event.
Big government is far more terrorizing than terrorists. How big and intrusive would a government have to be to stop someone intent on committing violence?
Goodth griefth Barneyth our gothermunth is farth biggerth thanth on 911 andth disth stillth happenth. Moron!