Posted on 04/13/2013 4:14:02 AM PDT by IbJensen
Authorities have confirmed that an apparent bomb addressed to Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio was uncovered and diverted, and now investigators are beginning to look into a list of his enemies for any links or connections.
Those who have had conflicts with him, those who might be coming under investigation, those who have been unsuccessful in fights with him.
That should be a job.
Arpaio, who has described himself as the “toughest sheriff in America,” has had conflicts over the past few years with advocates for illegal immigration, those who don’t like his enforcement of state laws in Arizona, and those who don’t like him investigating certain topics, including the validity of Barack Obama’s birth documentation. Others don’t like him because he’s been aggressive in fighting the war on illegal immigration in his border state, and his stand on law-and-order.
-snip-
Investigating Obama
A situation that earned Arpaio piles of hate mail developed when a group of his county’s residents asked him to look into the validity of the documents through which Barack Obama claims to be eligible for the Oval Office.
Entire books have been written about the problems with the “birth certificate” that was released by the White House purportedly documenting Obama’s birth in Hawaii.
-snip-
The special cold case posse investigators said there is probable cause to believe there was forgery in the creation of the birth document presented and fraud in its presentation to the people of Arizona as a valid document.
Christopher Monckton of Brenchley found himself agreeing, after going through the probabilities that each of the anomalies in the document was a random error.
He said he figured the chances of all of those circumstances simply developing at one in 62,500,000,000,000,000,000. (That’s 62.5 quintillion).
.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Then I had better drop this debate right now because I wouldn’t want to get caught in the crossfire and catch a cancer-slash-heart attack dart by mistake. Good luck with your work on the Cold Case Posse. Let me know when you indict someone.”
I’m assuming you read the comments in #72, the reply to which you responded.
So, you either need more PsyOps 101 lessons, or you need to develop a conscience. Because any human being who could respond in such a way is either a troll who needs more training or a complete asswipe who doesn’t care about anyone but “Me, Me, Me.”
Now, about that potassium chloride ...
I know that among other things it's used in fertilizer and cattle feed as well as in water softeners. It's also used as a salt substitute and in capital punishment. I also know that in order for it to be lethal in doses small enough to fit into this dart then it has to be injected intravenously. Now I can google it and get the chemical properties if you like but what is it you're trying to find out?
That video has been around for years. It’s valid, which, as you pointed out, is why they try to ridicule and sidetrack. I might add, if 0EO is getting paid for his/her efforts, the payor is getting ripped off. Bigtime.
Maybe he’s a trainee.
Yeah it speaks volumes. What appears to be a 9 mil pistol with an odd looking scope on it and some lady saying she worked on the project. How can anyone doubt a video like that?
So just out of curiosity, what kind of cancer did the gun administer?
It's hard to ridicule if there is no reason for it.
I know what calcium chloride is, its used to accelerate the hydration of concrete in cold weather, its basically a salt, reacts with heat when combined with water.
Go ahead and provide legitimate, valid references for all your scholarly claims you’ve made on this thread.. That’s standard protocol. I’ll come back later to educate myself.
Excuse my possibly lame comment here but farmers for decades if not well over a century or so have loaded muskets and shotgun slugs with such components as bacon rind and rock salt, designed to be non lethal but would definitely make an impact with a stinging reminder for days to come against watermelon thieves.
There is countless ways to deliver a small object at high speeds, even an object with little or no mass such as a porous pellet made of gelatin or something that is freeze dried, when it enters the body it absorbs moisture and resembles flesh, especially should it be itself an object made from a human cadaver.
The argument can go on forever about toxicity and venoms. I recall one African snake the Black mamba perhaps, they call it “three steps” or something, you get bit and three steps later you are dead.
I will if you will. Which one would you like me to start with?
Nice try. I have made no claims about potassium chloride. That would be you.
Go ahead. We’ll wait.
You know more than those who testified before Congress? They’re the ones you are disagreeing with.
They all do kinda smell alike, it seems. More ridicule-based than evidence-based, while claiming to have such a reasonable or logical worldview. Ironic.
If the government is secretly killing people through a completely untraceable method that leaves no evidence, then why don’t you believe that every single person who dies is killed by the government? Why is it only certain people?
I’ll answer for you: It fits your worldview.
Must be a very comfortable world when you can twist every event to confirm your biases. A lack of evidence is conclusive evidence that you’re right.
Ok, you’ve answered a question with a question, followed by more of your opinion, then concluded with more personal opinion.
Now can you address the questions the poster asked in #67, the reply to which you made the drive-by comment?
How would YOU know who was assassinated and who died of natural causes, if this technology is available as testified to in Congress?
Easy. I let my paranoid delusions guide the way.
Yes, I think you probably do, based on your unwillingness to seriously address a serious question using any degree of logic or evidence.
Why are we pouring so much money into coverts ops if we never get anything effective out of it? What do you think those people are wasting their time on?
Google is your friend.
Yes, how can anyone doubt that video you linked to? Some unnamed lady. A clip from a congressional hearing talking about some sort of gun. Ice darts. How can anyone be skeptical about all that?
If that testifier was telling the truth, would you consider this a serious issue? How serious? Why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.