Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"You Creationists are Not Qualified to Discuss Such Matters!"
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=4546 ^ | 2012 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved. | Jeff Miller, Ph.D.

Posted on 04/11/2013 7:38:52 AM PDT by kimtom

"..A common quibble laid at the feet of the creationist is that he/she is not qualified to speak about scientific matters relating to the creation/evolution controversy..."

(Excerpt) Read more at apologeticspress.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creationists; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 last
To: R7 Rocket

***I don’t think the two Genesis Creation accounts can be interpreted literally due to the fact that there are two Genesis accounts describing the Creator with two very different names.***

God has way more than two names in the bible.... this is a specious argument. You can view all the names of God here:

http://ft111.com/namesofgod.htm

The so-called “two Genesis accounts” argument is easily refuted by anyone who studies the bible.... that includes me. Fill me in on what you say the differences are and I’ll be glad to help you out.

I suggest you read it yourself and not go to some bible-thing website.


221 posted on 10/04/2013 5:40:10 AM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: schaef21

Previous post should say “bible-hating”.


222 posted on 10/04/2013 6:39:39 AM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: R7 Rocket; kimtom

Hey R7..... It looks like you picked up a thread here that’s been dead for over 5 months.

allmendream was very active on this thread on he has been banned. I notice that you’re brand new to FR. You’re not allmendream all dressed up in a new screen name are you?


223 posted on 10/04/2013 6:40:37 AM PDT by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

What kind of “Activism” do you think would be appropriate? At this point I think you’re probably going to need a global theocracy, and a lot of book burning and re-education to get the correct results.


224 posted on 10/04/2013 6:48:22 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I’ve found about the same percentage of geologists who believe the Earth is billions of years old as those who have never taken a course in Philosophy nor have drilled down to the underlying premises of their thinking.

Most of them build upon premises begging the question of their inquiry.


225 posted on 10/04/2013 6:54:24 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: schaef21; tacticalogic; BroJoeK

The first account has “Elohim” as Creater and “Elohim” is a plural word. The second account has “Yahweh” as Creator, which is singular.


226 posted on 10/04/2013 1:54:58 PM PDT by R7 Rocket (The Cathedral is Sovereign, you're not. Unfortunately, the Cathedral is crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson