Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sad, pathetic cowards, who like so many "progressive" Jews (there's an oxymoron if I ever heard one) embrace those who screw us and screw those who embrace us.
1 posted on 04/11/2013 7:21:41 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Impala64ssa

Didn’t they just prove her point about the imposition of shariah on America?


2 posted on 04/11/2013 7:25:25 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa

>>Sad, pathetic cowards, who like so many “progressive” Jews (there’s an oxymoron if I ever heard one) embrace those who screw us and screw those who embrace us. <<

You have to shake your head and ask whether these same Jews would vote for a platform that consist of, among other things:

* That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.

* We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

* We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

* We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

* We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

* We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.

I know all FReepers know where this is from. Sounds like obama, the democratic party and the LSM,.eh?


3 posted on 04/11/2013 7:34:27 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (LBJ declared war on poverty and lost. Barack Obama declared war on prosperity and won. /csmusaret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa

Cawardly synagogue.


7 posted on 04/11/2013 7:50:19 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa

Liberal NY Jews strike again.


12 posted on 04/11/2013 8:03:16 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa

There’s a vast difference between American Jews and Israeli Jews.

The Israelis are not cowards.

Come on in muslim terrorists and slit our throats.


13 posted on 04/11/2013 8:04:02 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa
Having been raised as a Jew, I can make the obvious comments regarding the retraction of that synagogue's invitation to Pam Geller. One more opening note: Skip the “self-loathing Jew” meme. Just because those JINO’s (Jews In Name Only), in that Synagogue, can't differentiate the Mosaic Law call for a “Just Society” from the communist call for “Social Justice” in no way applies to me or to a small part of the Jews who can read both the Founding Documents and the Torah/Talmud.

Cowardice and craven submission to the antisemitic, be they Muslims or Democratic Party officials, is neither safe nor an answer to Islam's 1,400 year history of attacking all who do not “Submit” to Islam. Regretibly, the Synagogue under discussion did submit. Worse yet, they exemplified the worst antisemitic caricature of the cowardly Jew, willing to accept any abuse because of an innate cowardice and unwillingness to defend themselves.

While Jews in that synagogue were busy practicing and perfecting their self-abasement, at another synagogue I know of, there is a social group called “Bagels & Bullets”. Twice a month, they hire a machine gun range and wrap themselves in the Second Amendment (and a lot of gun smoke and streams of spent brass).

These two synagogues exemplify the choice faced by America's Jews. Follow the Torah's commands and plow with a sword in one hand or devolve from freedom back into slavery. The choice before us today is as it has always been - Confidence or Cowardice. The choice can not be avoided because tyranny never rests. True for Muslims, true for home grown tyrants, like Democrats.

Whether we want to face the reality of 1,400 years of Islamic violence or not, Islam exists. What Geller says about Islam is accurate - accept that datum or Islam will eventually attack you. And, your self imposed wall of denial of what Islam is, will in no way protect you from the butchers of Islam.

The cowardice and crawling submissiveness of all too many of my fellow Jews deeply offends me. Why? Because your spineless submission endangers me! Indeed, your submission to Islam endangers all of America because such cowardice deludes Muslims into thinking they can succeed in America.

How dare you submit to tyranny? Is there something about what real Jews know as “The house of bondage” that you JINOs just can't live without?

Here are the reasons that Synagogue's submission to Islam is dangerous:
1. Craven submission at best only avoids the attack of the moment for a moment.
2. Submission encourages more attacks.
3. Being unwilling to fight in ones defense guarantees future attacks.

Summary: An unwillingness to defend ones faith and family are reasons why the term “kike” was invented and applied to such as those “Offen Juden” who cower before Islam. For those unfamiliar with the term “Offen Juden” it is a derogatory reference to the Jews who survived the ovens & gas chambers of the Third Reich and went forth to espouse, work for, and establish socialism in Israel, and in all too much of “Big Sh*ty” America.

I have deliberately chosen offensive but accurate words to describe the behavior of those Jews In Name Only (JINO’s) because their cowardice and unwillingness to defend their own freedom will place those better than they at risk. Muslims, like other predatory beasts, attack the weak - thus that Synagogue's submitting to Muslim?Democratic pressure endangers the rest of us.

Offended? Sorry, no part of the Constitution protects you from being offended.

Try countering my argument, rather than being offended. ‘Sides, the Waaahmbulance is unavailable right now.

;-)

15 posted on 04/11/2013 9:04:28 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impala64ssa

Once again, in the country that they ran to, in their escape from the Czar, from Eastern Europe, from the Nazis, the now-free for a generation Jews decide to be the little puppy, lie on their back, and wet the floor, disavowing their First Amendment Rights, bought with the blood of their American-born kinsmen in World War 2.


17 posted on 04/11/2013 9:41:31 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson