[EXCH54FE]

Expansion of background checks would be a significant victory for Obama. Don’t let anyone mislead you. Since they have put out all the bans and hoopla over them, they will be more than happy to take a step forward to infringe upon the Second Amendment with the expansion of background checks.

[Enterprise]

A lot of us understand perfectly well what Krauthammer was getting at. Obama does not want SOLUTIONS, he wants the ISSUES!

[null and void]

...and confiscate the money such a program would cost.

[andyk]

I watched that. Nothing he said was stunning. I didn’t understand the silence. But we do know that Wallace is no conservative.

[null and void]

“In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” - George Orwell

[andyk]

And yet still no one makes the argument that background are evil.

[oldbrowser]

Expansion of background checks would be a significant victory for Obama.

With the current technology, doing background checks can easily turn into a national data base of gun owners.
That data base can be used by an unscrupulous government in any number of creative ways to defeat the second amendment.

[WhiskeyX]

Rather than play a defense that must eventually erode into failure, the defenders of the 2nd Amendment need to play offense with seeking the repeal of the existing infringements of the 2nd Amendment. At worst, the laws would get no worse, and at best the unconstitutional laws would be repealed.

[TLI]

“All he wants now is the money,” Krauthammer responded.



There's the pitch . . . A swing . . . CRACK . . . it's out there folks!

Going, going, IT'S OVER THE FENCE FOR A HOME RUN ! !

Anyone with half functioning brain cells would know hussein is only fleecing the sheep at this point...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3004200/posts?page=18#18

.p

[onyx]

All together now, "Hell No!"

Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor!
Please sign up to Donate Monthly!

[txrefugee]

Camel, nose, tent...anyone who thinks the gun-grabbers will settle for gun registrion without working toward confiscation is a fool.

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

I guess like anything with the ObOzO the devil will be in the details. They may just leave a huge loophole. ObOzO really doesn’t give a crap about anything but fund raising so it is likely.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Figures... cash - the root of all evil.

[Truth2012]

I don’t understand this at all- Obama has always been in everything for the money.

What is the surprise?

[muawiyah]

A thought for you ~ since elected officials at every level are in effect gaining control over the firearms used by the agencies under their authority, they, too should be required to meet the standards of any firearm ownership background check.

Obamagoober hisse'f wouldn't qualify, nor would Biden, nor any of the various screwballs, losers, criminals and wierdos he's dragged into government.

3/4 the Democrat officeholders in the country wouldn't qualify.

We need an amendment on whatever Obamagoober's running dog lackeys have barfed up so that it applies to those who CONTROL publicly owned weaponry!

[OafOfOffice]

I didn’t watch this but assuming Krauthammer meant Obama knows it is a lost agenda but wants to collect money from his gun grabbing nazi supporters. So Obama stiffs taxpayers and flies around saying stuff Soros types want to hear for mega donations. Then if all that money works and they take the house, after 2014 there will be total annihilation of the 2nd amendment by Obama and dems.

[Mouton]

If his maximum eminence does not get what he wants out of this law i.e. at least universal background checks, he is going to throw a virtual tantrum. He is holding up his budget message perhaps to strengthen his vitriol. If he gets more than the minimum, he is going to shoot the moon on this proposal, if he doesn't get anything, it will be a
vile message for anyone against his position, even to those in his own party. His maximum eminence cannot stand to lose. I bet he kicked the dog when he missed all those basketball shots the other day because he was embarrassed publicly. This guy is a narcissist, make no mistake, and they cannot be denied. Right now he is supposedly “compromising” in his budget request. All bets are off once Reid brings this bill to the floor, they all know it. I'd love to see him throw a hissy fit on TV, in fact, I'd donate to anyone who makes it happen.

[dennisw]

Don’t doubt the Krauth! He has remote viewing capabilities. And as a previous freeper said, Obama learned from the race pimps who want to keep things on a simmer or a boil. They don’t want solutions. Their soltions all fail when they get put into practice.

Obama is the same. He pimps the “issues” such as amnesty and gun control to bring in donations to his permanent campaign organization. The people under him share in the spoils, useless eaters who never done any real work.

[Verginius Rufus]

I suggest as a face-saving compromise: background checks for purchasers of fireants.

[muir_redwoods]

So now every sale requires a background check. I see nothing that requires a background check for a one-time payment, thousand year lease. Maybe I need to read it more closely.

[Christie at the beach]

Charles said it right. Maybe he had a little too much wine. Sometimes, he tells the truth and that goes against the political Washington party gatherings. Me, I don't trust Charles completely. He does play for the inside team in some regards.