To: EXCH54FE
I watched that. Nothing he said was stunning. I didn’t understand the silence. But we do know that Wallace is no conservative.
4 posted on
04/06/2013 11:54:08 AM PDT by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: andyk
I understood the silence....He knows . and so did they, Obama goes after any issue which will generate monies he intends to control....so to hear it said point blank...well..'truth' has a distinct way of silencing when it's pointed directly and clearly....it closes mouths.
I ,for one of many, know Obama is after money.....he has favors and debts he still is paying off..both hear and internationally...and using it to trump anyone who gets in his way from being the player he desires... And that is the bottom line. Issues are simply the point of reference to debate...money is indeed what he's after.
12 posted on
04/06/2013 12:04:42 PM PDT by
caww
To: andyk
I’m with you. Somebody explain to me what was stunning.
My guess is that he was stating the obvious, the elephant in the room that nobody thought anyone would actually point to.
Is that correct?
33 posted on
04/06/2013 12:31:46 PM PDT by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: andyk
But we do know that Wallace is no conservative.Roger that. Wallace is a bootlicker masquerading as a conservative when he wants to.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson