Posted on 04/05/2013 6:57:46 AM PDT by Borges
Getting a literature Ph.D. will turn you into an emotional trainwreck, not a professor.
Who wouldnt want a job where you only have to work five hours a week, you get summers off, your whole job is reading and talking about books, and you can never be fired? Such is the enviable life of the tenured college literature professor, and all you have to do to get it is earn a Ph.D. So perhaps you, literature lover, are considering pursuing this path.
Well, what if I told you that by five hours I mean 80 hours, and by summers off I mean two months of unpaid research sequestration and curriculum planning? What if youll never have time to read books, and when you talk about them, youll mostly be using made-up words like deterritorialization and Otheringbecause, as Ron Rosenbaum pointed out recently, the dusty seminar rooms of academia have the chief aim of theorizing every great book to death? And I cant even tell you what kind of ass you have to kiss these days to get tenurelargely because, like most professors, Im not on the tenure track, so I dont know.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
And if you want tenure, you have to publish at lest one paper per year. All while you are advising students, teaching classes, and doing the research for said paper.
And grants - you better be good at bringing in that grant money - at least in my discipline.
KK <— who is writing her first grant, ugh!
You’re posting on a message board. If you don’t want to back up your statements I don’t know what to tell you.
Can you please back up one of your statements on another thread that Roger Ebert was...um...to paraphrase: “A humanistic Renaissance man”?! I almost lost my breakfast.
That's right. I'm not a quitter, I'm not a loser. I'm....I'm ...an early bailer. Yeah that's it. Early bailer.
I sometimes like to imagine myself a physicist, ensconced away in academia, surfacing just long enough now and then to publish my latest experimental results.
Then I remember that in conference or at lectures, groups of physicists don’t often smell as well as they should.
I know. I’m an earth scientist studying the means of tectonics. We all live on these rock structures....
I had a professor like that for world literature and another for German literature, Fortunately, this was before literature professors discovered Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, deconstructionism, "critical race theory," etc.
"Hardest work you'll ever do." LOL! This guy hasn't a clue. If reading books is the hardest work you'll ever do, you have no right expecting a job anywhere. Are Lit PhD's losers or are losers drawn to Lit careers?
They don’t just read. Do you think scholarship is for losers?
Would you or anyone know about her if she weren’t the color of brown?
Who’s to say. She has certainly benefited from it combined with her subject matter. I don’t think she’s nearly as good as her reputation but still quite good at her best (in the 1970s).
But all the same, not nearly as good as Zora Neale Hurston who was left out of serious study for a long time mainly because of her conservative politics.
Gilbert Highet's book The Art of Teaching (New York: Knopf, 1950) is one of my favorite books. I was unaware that he was a victim of that barbarian mob.
Some people seem to have a Ph.D in Philistinism.
Nabokov referred to a Ph.D as Department of Philistines.
“Scholarship isn’t a real job?”
I’m curious. Please explain how it is “a real job”.
Please explain how it isn’t. Thomas Sowell doesn’t have a job? Someone who provides new research/insight into a given subject matter via long hours spent scouring and researching hundreds of sources isn’t working?
As I said, Ph.D in Philistinism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.