Posted on 03/31/2013 5:02:56 AM PDT by Dartman
NEW YORK - Exxon Mobil was working to clean up thousands of barrels of oil in Mayflower, Arkansas, after a pipeline carrying heavy Canadian crude ruptured, a major spill likely to stoke debate over transporting Canadas oil to the United States.
Exxon shut the Pegasus pipeline, which can carry more than 90,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from Pakota, Illinois, to Nederland, Texas, after the leak was discovered on Friday afternoon, the company said in a statement.
Exxon, hit with a $1.7 million fine by regulators this week over a 2011 spill in the Yellowstone River, said a few thousand barrels of oil had been observed.
A company spokesman confirmed the line was carrying Canadian Wabasca Heavy crude. That grade is a heavy bitumen crude diluted with lighter liquids to allow it to flow through pipelines, according to the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA), which referred to Wabasca as oil sands in a report.
The spill occurred as the U.S. State Department is considering the fate of the 800,000 bpd Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude from Canadas oil sands to the Gulf Coast. Environmentalists, concerned about the impact of developing the oil sands, have sought to block its approval.
Supporters say Keystone will help bring down the cost of fuel in the United States.
The Arkansas spill was the second incident this week where Canadian crude has spilled in the United States. On Wednesday, a train carrying Canadian crude derailed in Minnesota, spilling 15,000 gallons of oil.
Exxon expanded the Pegasus pipeline in 2009 to carry more Canadian crude from the Midwest to the Gulf Coast refining hub and installed what it called new leak detection technology.
Exxon said federal, state and local officials were on site and the company said it was staging a response for a spill of more than 10,000 barrels to be conservative. Clean-up crews had recovered approximately 4,500 barrels of oil and water.
The air quality does not likely present a human health risk, with the exception of the high pooling areas, where clean-up crews are working with safety equipment, Exxon said in a statement.
U.S. media said the spill was in a subdivision. Mayflower city police said the oil had not reached Lake Conway nearby.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency categorized the rupture as a major spill, Exxon said, and 22 homes were evacuated following the incident.
A spokesman for the Department of Transportation confirmed that an inspector from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration had been sent to the scene to determine what caused the failure. The Environmental Protection Agency is the federal on-scene coordinator for the spill.
Some environmentalists argue that oil sands crudes are more corrosive than conventional oil, although a CEPA report, put together by oil and gas consultancy Penspen, argued diluted bitumen is no more corrosive than other heavy crude.
The U.S. Department of Transportation earlier this week proposed a fine of 1.7 million for Exxon over pipeline safety violations relating to a 2011 oil spill in the Yellowstone River. Exxons Silvertip pipeline, which carries 40,000 barrels per day of crude in Montana, leaked about 1,500 barrels of oil into the river in July 2011 after heavy flooding in the area.
In 1989, the Exxon Valdez supertanker struck a reef in Prince William Sound off Alaska and spilled 250,000 barrels of crude oil.
Sabotage!!!
I’m calling enviro-whacko sabotage by Ayatoilet Obunga’s or AlGore’s minions.
ping
Did zer0 orchestrate this like the sandy hook debacle (it is getting harder and harder for me to not be a conspiracy theorist with the scum in this regime )
Sabotage by the envirofascists.
Just wondering why there are no refineries being built closer to the source? Is it too expensive or is it EPA stuff?
Just curious.
“Sabotage by the envirofascists.”
Let me modify my comment: by envirofascists in conjunction with Obama and his minions.
Exactly
That’s a good question. I heard a talk radio guy here say he was out in Alberta and asked a gas station guy where the gas for his pumps was refined. The gas guy said, Oakville Ontario. So the crude is shipped from Alberta to Ontario, then the refined gas is shipped back. Huh?
I agree with you and suspect “envirofascists”.
Good thing the EPA wasn’t at the Spindletop Gusher in 1901.
We needed that to top off the article. Gimme a break.
The La Brea tar pits killed thousands of animals too.
Spindletop! Where Oil Became an Industry!
I just had to say that—it was the title given to every school kid in Beaumont (TX) in 1951 to write an essay. I was in the 8th grade at the time. I’m afraid most of us had no idea of the importance of the Lucas gusher to our town.
The gusher blew in in January of 1901. It was quite spectacular. There’s one old photograph of the gusher blowing into the air that was reproduced into poster size and plastered all over town during the week long celebration.
50 Million babies murdered? No big deal. Lets worry about the effect of an oil spill.
sabotage is what I think by some bast8d environmentalist willing to sacrifice the environment for some “greater good” in his small bean brain
It is near impossible to build a new refinery due to regulations and enviro opposition.
That is why you see current refineries expanding their capacity or, in the case of BP Whiting, IN, building a new refinery inside the current refinery.
They are all gearing up to process tar sands and North Dakota crude transported in by rail or tanker.
Nope, just a bible carrying assault rifle owner driving a SUV that ran into the pipe line that contained that evil Canadian crude.
I smell a ‘Rat!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.