1 posted on
03/26/2013 11:36:13 AM PDT by
edcoil
To: edcoil
But... but... but... how else can they manufacture probable cause?
2 posted on
03/26/2013 11:40:46 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
To: edcoil
I wonder if this extends to other areas, where the heavy hand of government ‘investigates’ your property from afar.
I saw a show on energy...but one thing I noted - the ‘authorities’ had the capability of flying around in a helicopter with a heat sensing device, slave to a mapping device, and they could quickly catalog who was ‘wasting’ energy. I wonder if that will stop.
I’ve also wondered about explosive sensing technology. It seems pretty sensitive...could the police drive down the street, pointing something at your house, and sense powder residue on a gun? And if so, would this ruling extend to that?
5 posted on
03/26/2013 11:47:40 AM PDT by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: edcoil
I belive they tried the infra red because inside plants didn’t light 24/7
To: edcoil
I’d gladly swap a dog sniff for the TSA Fondle.
Wonder how thi courts will rule on this?
(crickets)
12 posted on
03/26/2013 12:01:26 PM PDT by
BwanaNdege
("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
To: edcoil
too bad they also didn’t include drones as well. we are hardly secure anymore from illegal searches, anywhere.
just remember probable cause must be based on something readily apparent and in plain sight. not wanting to be searched is not probable cause, asserting your rights is not probable cause. otherwise we’d never be able to refuse anything.
13 posted on
03/26/2013 12:09:09 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: edcoil
Court: Drug dog sniff is unconstitutional search No worries. The 0bama Regime will bypass this technicality with a drone strike.
17 posted on
03/26/2013 12:14:29 PM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(It's not "GUN CONTROL"! It's "PEOPLE CONTROL"!)
To: edcoil
19 posted on
03/26/2013 12:49:33 PM PDT by
JustSayNoToNannies
("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
To: edcoil
21 posted on
03/26/2013 12:52:32 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: edcoil
I've asked many times in different threads and not gotten a single answer.
Is the recipient of a search warrant not entitled to read it, understand it and verify that it has been properly executed BEFORE allowing unrestricted entry?
I am NOT suggesting armed resistance, even if 100% justified. That's suicidal. But resistance nevertheless...
There must be some Constitutional attorneys out there (other than the ACLU; I still don't trust that literally Commie-created group.)
22 posted on
03/26/2013 1:02:07 PM PDT by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: edcoil
Can they still use the dogs on cars when the driver has not consented to a search? Is lack of consent probable cause? < /sarc >
25 posted on
03/26/2013 2:16:34 PM PDT by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
