[TomGuy]

Amnesty, Wallace asks about his opposition to E-verify. He wants Border security first, vote on every year.

I have a similar problem with Paul now that I had with Rubio a few weeks ago:

Both are saying they want border security first. Either they are naive or they are in on the shell game. If they are sincere, the government could made strident efforts in securing the border with EXISTING laws.

Otherwise, based on history, just having the canard in new legislation means it will be sidelined at will in the future.

They say they will not support a bill that does not have 'securing the border' as the prime requirement. We'll see -- when the bill comes out of committee. I am betting both will vote for any bill giving amnesty that comes to the floor for a vote.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Newt up with Wallace.

Ruling against DOMA would further undermine the public respect for the court.

Evan Bayh about to dive under the table and demonstrate his support for queer issues.

[rodguy911]

We'll see -- when the bill comes out of committee. I am betting both will vote for any bill giving amnesty that comes to the floor for a vote.

Bottom line you are right Tom,proof always in the pudding.

[Cheerio]

Both are saying they want border security first. Either they are naive or they are in on the shell game. If they are sincere, the government could made strident efforts in securing the border with EXISTING laws.

Boy do I agree with that one. NO new laws are needed in order for the Bush (pas) and the Obama (current) administrations to CLOSE THE BORDER. I think two decades has been suggicient time to close the border. Do it and then - and only then - we can enter into a national debate about immigration quotas and what to do with the hordes that are in our house illegally.