Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy

Newt up with Wallace.

Ruling against DOMA would further undermine the public respect for the court.

Evan Bayh about to dive under the table and demonstrate his support for queer issues.


40 posted on 03/24/2013 6:35:36 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

Newt looking like he’s about to do the obligatory Wahn slapdown.

There is no Constitutional right for the judges to pretend they are a Constitutional Convention. Why not just eliminate the Constitutional Amendment Process?

Newt, marriage is between a man and a woman. What happens when married P/Ms visit from a different state (that recognizes SSM)

Coming up, Obomber’s visit to the Middle East...(did he get good photo ops or just simply p!$$ off both sides?)


43 posted on 03/24/2013 6:42:23 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

None of the comments on DOMA address the primary reason why it was written, i.e., who is entitled to federal benefits like SS, Medicare, survivor’s benefits for federal pensions, etc. It has large monetary implications.


51 posted on 03/24/2013 6:55:57 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson