Skip to comments.
The GOP’s Complicity in the Spread of Gay Marriage
Crisis Magazine ^
| March 21, 2013
| George Neumayr
Posted on 03/21/2013 3:49:37 PM PDT by NYer
Proponents of gay marriage, as they eagerly anticipate the Supreme Courts examination of the issue next week, are chortling over recent polls that suggest the American publics resistance to it is fast eroding. They pointed this week to a Washington Post-ABC News poll in which 58 percent of Americans support gay marriage and 37 percent oppose it. This is an almost exact reversal from a decade ago, they say, when polls then showed 55 percent of Americans opposed gay marriage and 37 percent supported it.
Meanwhile, establishment Republicans, who have always been ambivalent about the issue, appear ready to wave the white flag. Quite literally, the opposition to gay marriage is dying off, claims columnist George Will. Columnist Michael Barone reports that at the Conservative Political Action Conference, a panel sponsored by the Competitive Enterprise Institute drew a large and approving crowd for a discussion labeled A Rainbow on the Right: Growing the Coalition, Bringing Tolerance Out of the Closet.
All of this holds great propaganda value for the Left, which always seeks to topple a taboo by emphasizing the inevitability of its elimination. The name of the game is to fool ordinary Americans into thinking that resistance is futile. Never mind that 30 states have managed to ban this inevitable change.
Yet it is true that the gay-marriage drive is picking up speed, even if that is overstated for propagandistic purposes. Why is this happening? Because of the intensity of the media and the Democrats? That is one reason. Another reason for it, which gets much less attention, is the weakness if not outright treachery of the Republicans.
The problem isnt just that Republicans lack the courage of their convictions on gay marriage. The problem is that they dont have any convictionsor hold the wrong ones. Recall that prominent Republicans, such as Dick Cheney and Laura Bush, endorsed gay marriage long before Obama and the Clintons did. It wasnt until this week that Hillary Clinton formally announced her support for nationalized gay marriage.
What was once a front-and-center issue for rank-and-file Republicansthe subject of many hotly worded House and Senate floor speechesis virtually a dead issue, Politico has reported.
Mitt Romney, the GOPs presidential nominee last year, couldnt even bring himself to defend Chick-fil-A against Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel, who said the restaurants opposition to gay marriage made it contrary to Chicago values and thus unworthy of a city permit. Romney didnt bring the issue of gay marriage up a single time in any of the debates and generally made comments indistinguishable from Obamas on gay rights (Romney endorsed gay adoption and told his campaign to remain mute on the repeal of Dont Ask, Dont Tell).
This week, Rob Portman, one of Romneys closest advisers and near-running mate (he almost selected him to be his vice presidential nominee but chose Paul Ryan instead), came out in support of gay marriage, citing his gay son whom he wishes to have the same opportunities to pursue happiness and fulfillment as his brother and sister.
According to Politico, Portman will pay almost no political price for this endorsement because the Republican leadership class agrees with him. Politico titled its story, GOP elite embraces Portman gay marriage switch, reporting: The reality Portmans flip-flop exposed is this: among the Republican political community, the people who actually run campaigns and operate super PACs, support for gay marriage is almost certainly a solid majority position. Among strategists born after the end of the Vietnam War, its not even a close call.
Support for gay marriage within this influential GOP circle is so uncontroversial that in February, according to Politico, a throng of top Republican politicos signed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to support a constitutional right to gay marriage. Among them were a half-dozen senior aides to Mitt Romneys 2012 presidential campaign…
Members of the Beltway GOP elite have been cynically manipulating social conservatives for years, seeking their votes while snickering at their views. They have long pretended to care about abortion and gay marriage, even as they undercut social conservatives at every turn and pushed the Big Tent.
Almost a decade ago social conservatives could barely convince George W. Bushs White House to issue a proclamation in favor of marriage during Marriage Protection Week. One activist said: Our leaders had to call the White House and say, You wont even do this? Bush strategist Karl Rove saw get-out-the-vote value in the issue, but nothing else. It came out later that the head of Bushs 2004 reelection effort, Ken Mehlman, was gay. Mehlman went on to lobby for passage of gay marriage in New York state, persuading a handful of undecided GOP state senators to provide the clinching support for the bill.
At the political level, the culture war has been hopelessly one-sided, with Republicans secretly and now not-so-secretly fighting alongside the Democrats on many critical fronts. As on the issue of women in combatfor which GOP capitulations during the Bush years paved the waygay marriage is spreading not in spite of the Republicans but because of them.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: amnesty; fudgepac; glbt; gop; homosexualagenda; libertarians; marriage; medicalmarijuana; nytimesagenda; ohio; randpaulisademocrat; republican; romney; romneyagenda; romneymarriage; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: chooseascreennamepat
So for you power > principles. Doesn’t matter the horses if you ain’t going in the right direction.
21
posted on
03/21/2013 4:21:03 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
(Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
To: NYer
It’s a Washington Post, Alphabet news poll. Of course it says American are in favor of gay marriage.
22
posted on
03/21/2013 4:26:45 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: JCBreckenridge
I don’t know what the relevance of your post is to this thread, but it isn’t true that Gingrich endorsed Murkowski in her run as an independent.
“Gingrich also lashed out at Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski for trying to get re-elected as a write-in candidate. He said Murkowski should cede to Joe Miller, and, that the time for running as an independent has long since passed.
I would say Senator Murkowski is fundamentally cheating, Gingrich said in a speech to the Values Voter Summit on Saturday.
The establishment is in such a state of shock, Gingrich said.
23
posted on
03/21/2013 4:31:08 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(" I would not be in the United States Senate if it wasnt for Sarah Palin " Cruz said.)
To: NYer
Sad to say, the general public has finally falling prey to the MSM 24/7 preoccupation with the public acceptance of homosexuals.
24
posted on
03/21/2013 4:40:18 PM PDT
by
Machfour
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
Exactly. The fiscal Republicans couldn’t care LESS about social issues and never did. They have cynically used us by PRETENDING to care about social issues.
25
posted on
03/21/2013 5:26:48 PM PDT
by
Hilda
To: ansel12
26
posted on
03/21/2013 5:37:32 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
(Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
To: highpockets
Actually, I have often wondered if they do divorce. Or, if they just part ways and find someone else to “marry”. It is not like they take marriage (real marriage) seriously.
To: JCBreckenridge
Who cares?
I if you have some problem with post 6 just tell us, your posts aren’t making any sense and I think you might be on the wrong thread.
28
posted on
03/21/2013 5:54:38 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(" I would not be in the United States Senate if it wasnt for Sarah Palin " Cruz said.)
To: JCBreckenridge
“So for you power > principles. Doesnt matter the horses if you aint going in the right direction.”
If the horses are tethered are they gonna move anything? How about a dose of reality? And yes, power will over power principles most every time.
29
posted on
03/21/2013 5:54:47 PM PDT
by
chooseascreennamepat
(It only takes one to start hostilities. It takes two to agree to end them.)
To: Hilda
Exactly. The fiscal Republicans couldnt care LESS about social issues and never did. They have cynically used us by PRETENDING to care about social issues. That is why "libertarian" is becoming the catch phrase, it finally gives them the ability to embrace the left, but with a much cooler sounding vocabulary, for instance, gay marriage and abortion as values of the "founding fathers" and the constitution.
30
posted on
03/21/2013 5:59:38 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(" I would not be in the United States Senate if it wasnt for Sarah Palin " Cruz said.)
To: chooseascreennamepat
Do you like where the party is headed? I don’t.
31
posted on
03/21/2013 6:48:11 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
(Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
To: NYer
32
posted on
03/21/2013 8:38:21 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: JCBreckenridge
“Do you like where the party is headed? I dont.”
I am not in love with where we, as a party, stand currently but it has taken 40 years or more to get here. Only a fool would expect we can completely reverse in one election cycle. In fact, don’t take offense, but, IMHO, doing so is counter productive. Everybody has a pet position that in some ways agrees with one of the liberal views. Taken all together this means that a radical shift back to the past is untenable to a large number of voters.
Sarah Palin opened the eyes of a number of RINOs. As have Ron Paul, Mario Rubio, et al. Lets continue the movement and see what happens.
BTW, a solid indication of my views can be seen by whom we have put up against the 0 in the last 2 elections.
33
posted on
03/22/2013 10:05:44 AM PDT
by
chooseascreennamepat
(It only takes one to start hostilities. It takes two to agree to end them.)
To: chooseascreennamepat
I’m not happy about the direction either. But I don’t see how we get to where we want to go by capitulating on crucial policy issues. Perhaps you see marriage as a hobby horse of the busybody housewives, but to me, its crucial to western society as a whole. Our choices really are the Christian lifestyle or sharia and if we reject the former we will get the latter - imposed on us by force.
Liberalism weakens us as a nation. Surely you and I both see it - collaborating with liberalism will not earn us that which we desire.
34
posted on
03/22/2013 11:09:59 AM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
(Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
To: NYer; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping! Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
There are only two options - mutiny to entirely reform the R party, or dump it. Anyone else see any other option?
Anyone wanting on/off either ping list, FREEPMAIL me.
35
posted on
03/24/2013 2:41:56 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: dfwgator
Very few gays are going to get married....that is not the point. The point is to make the gay lifestyle to be considered on par with heterosexual lifestyles, and to destroy what gays refer to as heteronormative society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Within days of the Massachusetts gay marriage law the homosexual curriculum was in the government schools....and....parents have ( according the courts) absolutely no right to object to it or be notified. The curriculum was prepackaged and “ready, set, go” for the schools. The same will happen in other states as well.
To: Norm Lenhart
this is a lesson for all those so called republicans, talking heads on radio etc.
They never wanted to mention social issues, they wanted to listen to the liberals and the media and play it safe and while they did that the homosexuals took a hold of the media, the teachers, the schools and infiltrated our party.
Many on our side could have fought this, spoke up to family, neighbors, talk radio could have mentioned this much more, , instead we let the liberal-tarians and the liberals come to our platforms, use our primaries, let them run with an R at the end of their name.
If 9 people in DC is going to tell tens of millions of ovters that their votes do not count now and that we should ignore the first amendment and ignore the basic reason why this country was founded on religion then we might as well have states leave this union so they can carry on the dream of the founders.
Communists wanted this decades ago and for any one on here staying silent on this issue and thinking they had better not say anything because they might be banned then have a word with yourself, you support the communist way of thinking, you;re not a republicans nor a conservative.
You are a social communist and helping their left wing radical agenda to ruin America.
37
posted on
03/24/2013 4:30:53 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: highpockets
I donp;t anyway support re defining marriage because once it has then all sorts of marriage can be brought forward and every argument whether love etc by the communists yuse can be used for any kind of marriage.
Plus while some might think this is no big deal then think about the children who will now be adopted, be taken to the freak parades, see two men living with each other, hilding each other, kissing each other, in bed with each other and be surrounded by immature perverted men and just how many boys now will be touched and raped?
You support homosexual not gay marriage because of divorce, really????????????????
We’ve already seen in MA how the first amendment has gone away, how many lawsuits will be brought to others who refuse to marry them who refuse to do any services to them, how many adoption agencies will be sued like Catholic charties.
would think that you woudl hahe thought a little more about this than just divorce and thought about the steps of a bigger agenda and the poor kids futures
38
posted on
03/24/2013 4:35:13 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Ann Archy
If my sons ever came home and tld me that they;re homsoexuals I would tell them right away about the feces they are having sex wiht, the diseases, the anal cancer, where the prostate is the colon is, what damge to the body can be a result, the life made shorter, the diseases etc.
I know thta they will not because I brought them up telling them about the dangers of the left wing communist agenda’s and I took time with my boys to raise them right.
He Portman is nothing but a pansy looking guy anyway and while he and others like him think that this might be cool or a way to get votes then he is wrong.
I hope he now is a masive target for the next election and he gets booted out and those elitist types in DC had batter wake up because their power will end when tens of millions who voted on this issue already will not vote for them.
9 judges will tell the country that their first amendment right will be taken away, the religious freedom, will churches then be sued, will adoptions agencies be sued, will people now be forced to marry these people and they can now get kids?
These 9 judges will now tell tens of millions of voters that their vote does not count, that all the millions spent was a waste and all the work done was for nothing because of these 9 people and a bunch of idiots in the GOP who never wanted to speak up and defend the future of the first amendment , the future of this country and fight against a communist agenda which was written about in 63.
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
all there for anyone to read, promote homosecuality, attack the traditional family etc
39
posted on
03/24/2013 4:41:23 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
exactly
Talk radio, the GOP talking heads always wanted to play it safe and talk debt, health care, fiscal policy but neevr social issues which are the backbone of this country and the future of this country.
They are as much to blame like the lieks of Hannity, Rove, Perino, Noonan, Hume, Krauthammer, Hoover, and who the hell does Mccain his daughter think she is to tell us that we have to change to suit her.
As for we livein in a different times, so shoudl we now allow polygamy, hey this is the 21st after all, shall we get rid of the age of consent and also teach 5 years olds about feces sex?
What a cop out they use , about moving forward
I will neevr accept that sham marriage and will not shut up about it to anyone to their face either if the issue is spoken
40
posted on
03/24/2013 4:44:57 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson