You didn’t read the article did you?
It should have been labeled:
“North Dakota passes most restrictive aint-abortion bills in nation”
I got that part; it isn’t what I was responding to.
The question I was addressing was “How — given the passage of these way Conservative anti-abortion bills — did ND end up sending a ‘rat to the U.S. Senate?”
If the electorate are as Conservative as these bills strongly suggest, why on Earth did the pull the lever for a ‘rat Senator?
The electoral dissonance makes no sense. ND puts a ‘rat in the U.S. Senate, but sends enough Conservatives to its own Legislature to swing the State to a more anti-abortion stance than any of the other 49 States?
I was just trying to explain how that happens without using the term “schizophrenia.” That’s all.
If you’ve got any more “inside baseball” than I do; please elucidate.