I got that part; it isn’t what I was responding to.
The question I was addressing was “How — given the passage of these way Conservative anti-abortion bills — did ND end up sending a ‘rat to the U.S. Senate?”
If the electorate are as Conservative as these bills strongly suggest, why on Earth did the pull the lever for a ‘rat Senator?
The electoral dissonance makes no sense. ND puts a ‘rat in the U.S. Senate, but sends enough Conservatives to its own Legislature to swing the State to a more anti-abortion stance than any of the other 49 States?
I was just trying to explain how that happens without using the term “schizophrenia.” That’s all.
If you’ve got any more “inside baseball” than I do; please elucidate.
I’ve thought about that a lot in regard to the contrast between the house election, senate and Presidential election.
It seems to me the most logical explication would be differences in turn out. Perhaps an indication of fraud based vote inflation and/or get out the vote effort advantages by the democrats, in specific urban areas.
Basically the corrupt democratic precits in urban areas producing much higher than normal vote totals throwing off state wide elections, but of course due to districting are unable to throw off the other state local elections.